update the MLPF model

[jpata]

Accompanying the PR cms-sw/cmssw#36841, we update the MLPF model file. No physics changes in standard workflows are expected.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jpata (Joosep Pata) for branch master.

@smuzaffar, @iarspider, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[clacaputo]

@cmsbuild please test

[perrotta]

@jpata would you mind signing this one also?
By the way, where is the old RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer/data/mlpf/mlpf_2020_11_04.pb file? I don't see it removed in this PR, but probably it should.

[jpata]

Correct, we should remove the old file. Is a follow-up OK?

[perrotta]

Correct, we should remove the old file. Is a follow-up OK?

This won't require other signature than your own: please do it now.
Then this and the accompanying PR can be merged together.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #3 was updated.

[jpata]

please test

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #3 was updated.

[jpata]

please abort

[perrotta]

please abort

[perrotta]

please test with #36841

[perrotta]

@smuzaffar I think the tests are stuck...
Is there anything to fix, or should I just try restarting them?

[smuzaffar]

please test with cms-sw/cmssw#36841

@perrotta note the correct cmssw PR name :-)

[perrotta]

Ops...
Thank you @smuzaffar !

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-630899/22346/summary.html
COMMIT: b1b5f74
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-02-10-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-data/RecoParticleFlow-PFProducer/3/22346/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• @adewit Phase2 tracker: add T30 (geometry with more realistic TFPX) cms-sw/cmssw#36660
• @bsunanda Run3-alca216Y To make the response study work without HLT information if needed cms-sw/cmssw#36912
• @makortel Add option in IgProfService to dump profiles at {pre,post}ModuleEvent cms-sw/cmssw#36923

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-630899/22346/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-630899/22346/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3764395
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3764371
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 45 files compared)
• Checked 193 log files, 42 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

@jpata can you sign as soon as you want to notify us that you are happy with the data PR?

[jpata]

+reconstruction

• tested in Updated MLPF producer with ONNX cms-sw/cmssw#36841
• remove the old TF model, add the new ONNX model

[smuzaffar]

+externals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

[perrotta]

merge