Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: bump juju 3.1 -> 3.5 in track/2.1 #241

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

@DnPlas DnPlas commented Jun 18, 2024

@DnPlas DnPlas requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2024 20:15
@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Jun 18, 2024

The problem with the CI is that mysql-k8s 8.0/edge requires juju <3.5.0 or ==3.5.2, which hasn't been released. This CI will be blocked until we do either of:

a) Use mysql-k8s 8.0/stable - this is problematic because they will soon promote from 8.0/edge, which will leave us with the same issue
b) Pin juju to a different version, it can be 3.4.3

@orfeas-k
Copy link
Contributor

orfeas-k commented Jun 21, 2024

I 'd go with a) since I 'd expect taking this requirement into account before promoting edge -> stable, since it's a breaking change in a way. Apart from that:

  1. juju 3.5.2 is hopefully released soon
  2. we 'd need to modify mysql channel either way, since using edge is not recommended.

This way, if they promote and we hit this issue again, we can then consider what we do with the juju version, taking into account what is decided in canonical/bundle-kubeflow#940

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Jun 27, 2024

#246 should help fix the CI. Lets merge that before this one.

EDIT: there is a circular dependency between this PR and #246. We will have to merge one and then rebase the other one.

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Jun 27, 2024

Closing this PR as it will be replaced by #241

@DnPlas DnPlas closed this Jun 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants