Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare release r1.2 #45

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Prepare release r1.2 #45

merged 13 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

jgarciahospital
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?

Add one of the following kinds:

  • subproject management

What this PR does / why we need it:

Prepare the release 1.2 with the required changes.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #35
Related to #44

Special notes for reviewers:

Pending to include #44 before merging this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@hdamker hdamker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some suggestions and one needed change in YAML to be aligned with ICM 0.2.0

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated
* Include testing definitions in .feature file for Fall24 meta-release by @jgarciahospital in https://github.com/camaraproject/PopulationDensityData/pull/44

### Changed
* N/A
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't be #42 worth to mention here? ... it updated not only the description within the info object but the complete inline documentation across the API definition.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Included, sorry I missed to report previous PRs from rc1.1

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Checklist for population-density-data 0.1.1-rc.1 in release r1.1
| 4 | API versioning convention applied | M | M | M | M | Y | |
| 5 | API documentation | M | M | M | M | Y | Embed documentation into API spec - [link](/code/API_definitions/population-density-data.yaml) |
| 6 | User stories | O | O | O | M | N | |
| 7 | Basic API test cases & documentation | O | M | M | M | Pending | |
| 7 | Basic API test cases & documentation | O | M | M | M | Y | Included in Test PR#44 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to be updated after the merge of #44 or you anticipate here the link.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I didn't make any change in the table since #44 is also modifying that part of the file, avoiding conflicts.

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
jgarciahospital and others added 3 commits August 24, 2024 13:30
Co-authored-by: Herbert Damker <herbert.damker@telekom.de>
…adiness-Checklist.md

Co-authored-by: Herbert Damker <herbert.damker@telekom.de>
@bigludo7
Copy link
Collaborator

bigludo7 commented Sep 5, 2024

@jgarciahospital - to be sure we're aligned.
I've added easy comments to fix for #44 & #47 - we solve them & merge them first and then we close this one - work for you?

@jgarciahospital
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jgarciahospital commented Sep 5, 2024

@jgarciahospital - to be sure we're aligned. I've added easy comments to fix for #44 & #47 - we solve them & merge them first and then we close this one - work for you?

Thanks Ludovic for the review, comments applied in #44 and #47 and pending to be merged before close release PR.
Please @sachinvodafone for your validation

@tanjadegroot
Copy link

I spotted a bug in the version used in the test file- see comment on #44

@jgarciahospital
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I spotted a bug in the version used in the test file- see comment on #44

Thanks @tanjadegroot , solved.

For information, API readiness checklist filename will be maintained as fixed in #44 after merging this PR

hdamker
hdamker previously approved these changes Sep 9, 2024
@hdamker
Copy link
Contributor

hdamker commented Sep 9, 2024

@jgarciahospital @maheshc01 @sachinvodafone I approved the changes to remove the block from requested changes (they are addressed - thanks!). For me everything here looks good, but #44 and #47 need still to be approved and merged first. Would be good if you can do that asap so that we get this release still into the Meta-Release (we need to prepare the communication material the next days ... as M5 is approaching).

sachinvodafone
sachinvodafone previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2024
sachinvodafone
sachinvodafone previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2024
hdamker
hdamker previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hdamker hdamker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great - LGTM.

The one point I found is not really relevant, but just confused me, as I know that the latest change was in ICM v0.2.0-rc.2 (which you have correctly applied already in r1.1)

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Herbert Damker <herbert.damker@telekom.de>
@jgarciahospital
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Great - LGTM.

The one point I found is not really relevant, but just confused me, as I know that the latest change was in ICM v0.2.0-rc.2 (which you have correctly applied already in r1.1)

Included for clarity, thanks @hdamker

Copy link
Collaborator

@bigludo7 bigludo7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Thanks @jgarciahospital

@tanjadegroot
Copy link

tanjadegroot commented Sep 11, 2024

@sachinvodafone @gregory1g @maheshc01 @rartych please review this PR, create the API release and update the API release tracker - we want to close the M4 today please :-)

@hdamker
Copy link
Contributor

hdamker commented Sep 11, 2024

@jgarciahospital if the lack of an code owner review is blocking you, let me know and I help to merge. I see that @sachinvodafone has multiple times approved previously.

@jgarciahospital
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jgarciahospital if the lack of an code owner review is blocking you, let me know and I help to merge. I see that @sachinvodafone has multiple times approved previously.

Conscious that API review was made during last meeting, and that we have at least one other company's approval, we can wait until tomorrow for a code owner approval or move directly if @hdamker you want to close today the milestone.

@tanjadegroot
Copy link

Approval on this PR from Release Management: LGTM

@hdamker
Copy link
Contributor

hdamker commented Sep 11, 2024

Conscious that API review was made during last meeting, and that we have at least one other company's approval, we can wait until tomorrow for a code owner approval or move directly if @hdamker you want to close today the milestone.

We want to close today 👍

With the additional approval from @tanjadegroot I suppose we are good to go, will merge.
@jgarciahospital may you take the creation of the release and the update of the release tracker?

@hdamker hdamker merged commit faae1ff into main Sep 11, 2024
1 check passed
@hdamker hdamker deleted the jgarciahospital-patch-5 branch September 11, 2024 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Population Density Data Readiness Checklist
5 participants