-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prepare release r1.2 #45
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some suggestions and one needed change in YAML to be aligned with ICM 0.2.0
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
* Include testing definitions in .feature file for Fall24 meta-release by @jgarciahospital in https://github.com/camaraproject/PopulationDensityData/pull/44 | ||
|
||
### Changed | ||
* N/A |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't be #42 worth to mention here? ... it updated not only the description within the info object but the complete inline documentation across the API definition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Included, sorry I missed to report previous PRs from rc1.1
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Checklist for population-density-data 0.1.1-rc.1 in release r1.1 | |||
| 4 | API versioning convention applied | M | M | M | M | Y | | | |||
| 5 | API documentation | M | M | M | M | Y | Embed documentation into API spec - [link](/code/API_definitions/population-density-data.yaml) | | |||
| 6 | User stories | O | O | O | M | N | | | |||
| 7 | Basic API test cases & documentation | O | M | M | M | Pending | | | |||
| 7 | Basic API test cases & documentation | O | M | M | M | Y | Included in Test PR#44 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to be updated after the merge of #44 or you anticipate here the link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I didn't make any change in the table since #44 is also modifying that part of the file, avoiding conflicts.
documentation/API_documentation/Population-Density-Data-API-Readiness-Checklist.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Herbert Damker <herbert.damker@telekom.de>
…adiness-Checklist.md Co-authored-by: Herbert Damker <herbert.damker@telekom.de>
@jgarciahospital - to be sure we're aligned. |
Thanks Ludovic for the review, comments applied in #44 and #47 and pending to be merged before close release PR. |
I spotted a bug in the version used in the test file- see comment on #44 |
Thanks @tanjadegroot , solved. For information, API readiness checklist filename will be maintained as fixed in #44 after merging this PR |
@jgarciahospital @maheshc01 @sachinvodafone I approved the changes to remove the block from requested changes (they are addressed - thanks!). For me everything here looks good, but #44 and #47 need still to be approved and merged first. Would be good if you can do that asap so that we get this release still into the Meta-Release (we need to prepare the communication material the next days ... as M5 is approaching). |
63a1c36
…on-density-data-API-Readiness-Checklist.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great - LGTM.
The one point I found is not really relevant, but just confused me, as I know that the latest change was in ICM v0.2.0-rc.2 (which you have correctly applied already in r1.1)
Co-authored-by: Herbert Damker <herbert.damker@telekom.de>
Included for clarity, thanks @hdamker |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks @jgarciahospital
@sachinvodafone @gregory1g @maheshc01 @rartych please review this PR, create the API release and update the API release tracker - we want to close the M4 today please :-) |
@jgarciahospital if the lack of an code owner review is blocking you, let me know and I help to merge. I see that @sachinvodafone has multiple times approved previously. |
Conscious that API review was made during last meeting, and that we have at least one other company's approval, we can wait until tomorrow for a code owner approval or move directly if @hdamker you want to close today the milestone. |
Approval on this PR from Release Management: LGTM |
We want to close today 👍 With the additional approval from @tanjadegroot I suppose we are good to go, will merge. |
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Prepare the release 1.2 with the required changes.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #35
Related to #44
Special notes for reviewers:
Pending to include #44 before merging this PR