Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert RESTJSON and RESTXML changes of SDK v1.11.0 #1551

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2017

Conversation

jasdel
Copy link
Contributor

@jasdel jasdel commented Sep 26, 2017

Bug discovered in RESTXML protocol marshaler that did not correctly marshal some of the Route53's due to the locationName tag wrapping the request parameters. This only impacted Route53 API operations.

Related to #1550

…aws#1547)"

This reverts commit 1a10a10.

Reverts RESTJSON marshaler improvement due to bug in RESTXML
@jasdel jasdel self-assigned this Sep 26, 2017
@jasdel jasdel requested a review from xibz September 26, 2017 22:03
@jasdel jasdel merged commit 6a946b2 into aws:master Sep 26, 2017
@jasdel jasdel deleted the revert/SDKv1.11 branch September 26, 2017 22:35
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
This reverts commit 6a946b2.

Fixes the aws#1550 bug with RESTXML not correctly marshaling Amazon Route53 APIs
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
This reverts commit 6a946b2.

Fixes the aws#1550 bug with RESTXML not correctly marshaling Amazon Route53 APIs
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2017
This reverts commit 6a946b2.

Fixes the aws#1550 bug with RESTXML not correctly marshaling Amazon Route53 APIs
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2017
This reverts commit 6a946b2.

Fixes the aws#1550 bug with RESTXML not correctly marshaling Amazon Route53 APIs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants