-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 665
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(bpp_common): add tests for the static drivable area #9324
test(bpp_common): add tests for the static drivable area #9324
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project! 🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode. Please ensure:
|
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9324 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 29.24% 29.41% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 1335 1339 +4
Lines 102954 102992 +38
Branches 39937 39943 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 30114 30298 +184
+ Misses 69920 69747 -173
- Partials 2920 2947 +27
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
...havior_path_planner/autoware_behavior_path_planner_common/test/test_static_drivable_area.cpp
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ
should be preferred than EXPECT_EQ
in some cases, but rather than that it LGTM.
...havior_path_planner/autoware_behavior_path_planner_common/test/test_static_drivable_area.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Maxime CLEMENT <maxime.clement@tier4.jp>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Description
Add tests for some of the static drivable area functions.
Related links
Parent Issue:
How was this PR tested?
Notes for reviewers
None.
Interface changes
None.
Effects on system behavior
None.