Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(intersection_occlusion): fix for PR6273 without traffic light #6335

Merged

Conversation

soblin
Copy link
Contributor

@soblin soblin commented Feb 6, 2024

Description

To run intersection_occlusion by default, PR #6273 was shipped to handle intersection with traffic light smoothly. But it was missing the care for intersection without traffic light.

Related links

Tests performed

https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/16a8370a-8fc2-5763-8dbe-3520492cef8c?project_id=prd_jt

without traffic light

image

with traffic light

initially, if no traffic light information is available, occlusion is ignored.
image

if traffic light information is available, occlusion is cared.
image

Notes for reviewers

Interface changes

Effects on system behavior

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

Signed-off-by: Mamoru Sobue <mamoru.sobue@tier4.jp>
This reverts commit 80a271f.
Signed-off-by: Mamoru Sobue <mamoru.sobue@tier4.jp>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Feb 6, 2024
@soblin soblin marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2024 13:20
@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 added the run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Feb 6, 2024
@soblin soblin enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2024 13:26
@soblin soblin merged commit f7d386a into autowarefoundation:main Feb 6, 2024
26 of 28 checks passed
@soblin soblin deleted the fix/intersection_occlusion/pr6273 branch February 6, 2024 17:19
anhnv3991 pushed a commit to anhnv3991/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
StepTurtle pushed a commit to StepTurtle/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2024
karishma1911 pushed a commit to Interplai/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants