refactor(run_out): add state machine class for state transition

[TomohitoAndo]

Description

• Refactored state transition
• Added documents.

NOTE: This PR doesn't change the actual behavior because this is just refactoring.

changes for tier4/autoware_launch
tier4/autoware_launch#495

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 10.05% // Head: 9.98% // Decreases project coverage by -0.07% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (659e4d6) compared to base (cf5b363).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             main   #1884      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   10.05%   9.98%   -0.08%     
=========================================
  Files        1257    1259       +2     
  Lines       90472   91117     +645     
  Branches    20335   20788     +453     
=========================================
  Hits         9094    9094              
- Misses      72020   72609     +589     
- Partials     9358    9414      +56     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	4.24% <0.00%> (?)
total	10.03% <0.00%> (ø)		Carriedforward from 238bb4c

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ner/include/scene_module/run_out/state_machine.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ity_planner/include/scene_module/run_out/utils.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ocity_planner/src/scene_module/run_out/manager.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...elocity_planner/src/scene_module/run_out/scene.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...planner/src/scene_module/run_out/state_machine.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...pic_state_monitor/src/topic_state_monitor_core.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ity_planner/src/scene_module/intersection/util.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[0x126]

LGTM

[TomohitoAndo]

@TakaHoribe
If there are no problems, could you approve this as code owner of tier4_planning_lancuh package?

[kosuke55]

(FYI: horibe-san is absent today and I added other owners of tier4_planning_lancuh #1955)

[TomohitoAndo]

@tkimura4 @shmpwk
If there are no problems, could you approve this as maintainer of the package?

[shmpwk]

LGTM! maybe the config should be reflected to https://github.com/tier4/autoware_launch/pulls also?

[TomohitoAndo]

@shmpwk

maybe the config should be reflected to https://github.com/tier4/autoware_launch/pulls also?

yes! I will create the PR for tier4/autoware_launch and post a link in this PR.

[TomohitoAndo]

I created PR for tier4/autoware_launch

• chore: sync awf-latest tier4/autoware_launch#495