Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint #1634

Merged

Conversation

h-ohta
Copy link
Contributor

@h-ohta h-ohta commented Aug 19, 2022

Description

  • apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@h-ohta h-ohta requested a review from yukkysaito August 19, 2022 09:36
@h-ohta h-ohta enabled auto-merge (squash) August 19, 2022 09:36
@h-ohta h-ohta disabled auto-merge August 19, 2022 09:37
@h-ohta h-ohta enabled auto-merge (squash) August 19, 2022 09:37
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1634 (7f9aed6) into main (d47adcc) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1634   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   10.71%   10.71%           
=======================================
  Files        1109     1109           
  Lines       78447    78447           
  Branches    18547    18547           
=======================================
  Hits         8403     8403           
  Misses      61184    61184           
  Partials     8860     8860           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 0.00% <ø> (?)
total 10.69% <0.00%> (ø) Carriedforward from d47adcc

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../include/mission_checkpoint/mission_checkpoint.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...clude/planning_debug_tools/trajectory_analyzer.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
..._debug_tools/include/planning_debug_tools/util.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@yukkysaito yukkysaito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@h-ohta h-ohta merged commit 5b60f19 into autowarefoundation:main Aug 19, 2022
@h-ohta h-ohta changed the title refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_ch… refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint Aug 22, 2022
boyali referenced this pull request in boyali/autoware.universe Sep 28, 2022
…eckpoint (tier4#1634)

refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint
boyali referenced this pull request in boyali/autoware.universe Oct 3, 2022
…eckpoint (tier4#1634)

refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint
boyali referenced this pull request in boyali/autoware.universe Oct 3, 2022
…eckpoint (tier4#1634)

refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint
yukke42 pushed a commit to tzhong518/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2022
…eckpoint (autowarefoundation#1634)

refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint
@h-ohta h-ohta deleted the refactor/tier4_planning_rviz_2 branch October 17, 2022 05:45
boyali referenced this pull request in boyali/autoware.universe Oct 19, 2022
…eckpoint (tier4#1634)

refactor(tier4_planning_rviz_plugin): apply clang-tidy for mission_checkpoint
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants