Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: remove not needed workflow #157

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

codingtenshi
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes not needed golang workflow.

This change will optimize github actions runtime.

Thanks to this line the file I just removed will not be created here by bot again.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 8, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Nov 23, 2022

@emilianozublena hey, can you approve? The change is valid

@emilianozublena
Copy link
Member

Approved, but what about the failing test in here, is it relevant @derberg ?

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Dec 1, 2022

@emilianozublena omg you're back 😄 🍾 🥳

tests are failing because basic scripts are missing, it is related to #151

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Dec 1, 2022

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit dd185ba into asyncapi:master Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants