-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/jo/state managed udp #176
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lukasa
reviewed
Jul 8, 2023
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramBootstrap.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramBootstrap.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramChannel.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramChannel.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramListenerChannel.swift
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramListenerChannel.swift
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Joannis
force-pushed
the
feature/jo/state-managed-udp
branch
from
July 10, 2023 10:04
13a6a6f
to
adfcaeb
Compare
@Lukasa updated |
Note that there were 2 small issues in the state managed channels that I've had to fix as well |
Lukasa
reviewed
Jul 20, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some initial comments.
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramBootstrap.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramListener.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Cory Benfield <lukasa@apple.com>
Lukasa
reviewed
Aug 9, 2023
Sources/NIOTransportServices/Datagram/NIOTSDatagramListener.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Lukasa
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2023
Lukasa
requested changes
Aug 10, 2023
Tests/NIOTransportServicesTests/NIOTSDatagramConnectionChannelTests.swift
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Lukasa
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice one, thanks.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for UDP clients and servers.
Motivation:
This change was made because UDP support was lacking on iOS. It's needed by my DNS client implementation, which I am in turn using for an iOS app I'm working on relying on SRV typed records.
Modifications:
NIOTSDatagramListenerBootstrap
for making UDP servicesNIOTSDatagramListenerChannel
that accepts UDP connectionsNIOTSDatagramChannel
for UDP client connectionsNIOTSDatagramBootstrap
that can create a new UDP clientNotes
This PR relies on #174 and #175, but it separated so that it's easy to review.
This has been tested against my own libraries, but only features one test.
While I believe it to be working, I'm looking for feedback on how I can better test this implementation.