Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-46002][INFRA][FOLLOWUP] Upgrade to Python 3.9 in daily maven test #43975

Closed

Conversation

zhengruifeng
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Upgrade to Python 3.9 in daily maven test

Why are the changes needed?

to be consistent with #43902

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

no

How was this patch tested?

ci

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

no

@github-actions github-actions bot added the INFRA label Nov 23, 2023
@zhengruifeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @LuciferYang

if: (contains(matrix.modules, 'sql#core'))
run: |
python3.8 -m pip install 'numpy>=1.20.0' pyarrow pandas scipy unittest-xml-reporting 'grpcio==1.56.0' 'protobuf==3.20.3'
python3.8 -m pip list
python3.9 -m pip install 'numpy>=1.20.0' pyarrow pandas scipy unittest-xml-reporting 'grpcio==1.56.0' 'protobuf==3.20.3'
Copy link
Contributor

@LuciferYang LuciferYang Nov 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the versions of the modules need to be upgraded simultaneously, like grpcio and protobuf

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, I think is should be the same

@zhengruifeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

merged to master, thanks @LuciferYang

@zhengruifeng zhengruifeng deleted the infra_sql_py_followup branch November 23, 2023 08:18
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants