Merged CodeQL workflow into main workflow. #114
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a workaround which ensures that the test
reports end up in the correct workflow.
|
looks like the CodeQL alerts are going to be reset (reported as new issues, while the old are removed) since the job is started from a different file. |
|
closing in favor of #119 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
followup on #113
This is a workaround which ensures that the test reports end up in the correct workflow.
example:
JUnit reports of:
https://github.com/apache/roller/actions/runs/1627718913
ended up here:
https://github.com/apache/roller/actions/runs/1627718912
If there is just one workflow, they can't end up in the wrong one :)