Update contact headings

[chris-gds]

What?

Updating schemas to reflect work done on this PR alphagov/govspeak#206

Why?

Headings have been changed to paragraph copy within contact information due to a11y. They shouldn't be bold as it looks like a heading but is not also the h3 is not always correct when used in the flow of a document

Anything else?

Live Ref page
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-voluntary-calorie-guidelines-to-help-industry-tackle-obesity

[alex-ju]

Updating these examples makes sense after updating govspeak to replace the heading with a paragraph.

However, I think there is a tradeoff with the change itself. I understand there were problems with the heading level, but with this change, people will find it harder to reach the contact details using the landmark navigation.

[chris-gds]

However, I think there is a tradeoff with the change itself. I understand there were problems with the heading level, but with this change, people will find it harder to reach the contact details using the landmark navigation.

🤔 I take your point, ideally this entire contact section needs something so a user can easily navigate to it. First thoughts are thinking <section> & <address> would aid with this. Will revisit.

[alex-ju]

However, I think there is a tradeoff with the change itself. I understand there were problems with the heading level, but with this change, people will find it harder to reach the contact details using the landmark navigation.

🤔 I take your point, ideally this entire contact section needs something so a user can easily navigate to it. First thoughts are thinking <section> & <address> would aid with this. Will revisit.

Indeed, the contact section could be improved with semantic markup and microdata, but I'm not sure if it's in the scope of this work.

[chris-gds]

Captured suggestions for prioritisation by PM