FRO-754,761: Feature - contract code solidity #1200
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
6 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements to the EVM contract verification system, focusing on modularizing the verification process for both Solidity and Vyper contracts. Key changes include the addition of a new feature for EVM contract verification with contract code, updates to various components to support generic type parameters, and restructuring form handling for improved flexibility. The overall organization of form data and verification options has been refined, enhancing type safety and clarity in the verification workflow. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmVersionToTarget.tsx (1)
Line range hint
32-39: Consider expanding EVM version options.The
evmVersionOptionsarray only includes a "Default" option. Consider adding more EVM versions to support different Ethereum protocol upgrades (e.g., London, Berlin, Istanbul).Example options to consider:
const evmVersionOptions = [ { label: "Default", value: "default" }, { label: "London", value: "london" }, { label: "Berlin", value: "berlin" }, { label: "Istanbul", value: "istanbul" }, { label: "Petersburg", value: "petersburg" }, { label: "Constantinople", value: "constantinople" }, ];
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/types.ts (2)
77-78: Validate that 'contractName' is not emptyIn the Vyper contract code form,
contractNameshould not be empty as it's required for identification during verification. Add validation to ensure it's provided.Apply this diff to enforce the validation:
-contractName: z.string(), +contractName: z.string().min(1, "Contract name is required"),
40-41: Ensure 'name' in contract libraries is not emptyThe
namefield inzContractLibraryshould not be empty when a library is provided. Add validation to prevent empty names, which could lead to confusion or errors in library resolution.Apply this diff to enforce non-empty names:
-name: z.string(), +name: z.string().min(1, "Library name is required"),src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmVersionToTarget.tsx (1)
25-25: Type casting in field paths could be improved.The type casting of field paths using
as FieldPath<T>could be made more type-safe.Consider creating a type utility to ensure type safety:
type EnsureFieldPath<T, P extends string> = P extends FieldPath<T> ? P : never; // Usage name: EnsureFieldPath<T, `${typeof name}.evmVersion`>Also applies to: 29-29
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyForms.tsx (1)
47-49: Consider handling invalid verify options explicitly.The default case silently returns null. Consider logging a warning or throwing an error for invalid options in development.
default: + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { + console.warn(`Unhandled verify option: ${verifyOption}`); + } return null;src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/ConstructorArgs.tsx (2)
46-48: Simplify onChange handler.The onChange handler could be simplified by directly using the checked value.
- onChange={(e) => - field.onChange({ ...field.value, enabled: e.target.checked }) - } + onChange={(e) => field.onChange({ enabled: e.target.checked, value: field.value?.value ?? '' })}
Line range hint
61-70: Enhance error handling in ControllerTextarea.The error handling could be improved by providing more specific validation messages.
Consider adding validation rules:
rules: { validate: { hexFormat: (value) => !value || /^0x[0-9a-fA-F]*$/.test(value) || 'Constructor arguments must be in hexadecimal format', evenLength: (value) => !value || value.length % 2 === 0 || 'Constructor arguments must have an even length' } }src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperContractCode.tsx (1)
19-19: Consider centralizing form field paths.Form field paths are repeated throughout the code. Consider centralizing them to avoid typos and improve maintainability.
const FORM_FIELDS = { CONTRACT_NAME: 'verifyForm.vyperContractCode.contractName', CONTRACT_CODE: 'verifyForm.vyperContractCode.contractCode', BASE_PATH: 'verifyForm.vyperContractCode' } as const;Also applies to: 26-26, 38-38, 47-47
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityHardhat.tsx (1)
58-58: Consider using a more descriptive placeholder for constructor arguments.The placeholder
<...constructorArgs>might be unclear to users. Consider using a more descriptive format like"<constructor-arg-1> <constructor-arg-2> ..."to better indicate the expected input format.- <...constructorArgs>`; + "<constructor-arg-1> <constructor-arg-2> ..."`;src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityContractCode.tsx (2)
30-39: Consider adding validation for contract code input.The
ControllerTextareafor contract code input should include validation rules to ensure the input is valid Solidity code.<ControllerTextarea label="Contract Code" placeholder="Provide contract source code here" name="verifyForm.solidityContractCode.contractCode" isRequired control={control} variant="fixed-floating" error={error?.message} height="400px" + rules={{ + required: "Contract code is required", + validate: { + validSolidity: (value) => + value.includes("contract") || "Invalid Solidity contract code" + } + }} />
41-56: Consider grouping related form sections.The form sections (ConstructorArgs, EvmVersionToTarget, OptimizerConfiguration, ContractLibraries) are all using the same control and name prefix. Consider creating a wrapper component to avoid repetition.
interface VerificationSectionProps<T> { control: Control<T>; name: string; component: React.ComponentType<any>; } const VerificationSection = <T,>({ control, name, component: Component }: VerificationSectionProps<T>) => ( <Component control={control} name={name} /> );src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyOptions.tsx (2)
13-43: Extract common Radio button properties to reduce duplication.Both
EvmContractVerifyOptionsVyperandEvmContractVerifyOptionsSoliditycomponents have significant prop duplication in their Radio components.Consider creating a reusable Radio component:
interface VerifyOptionRadioProps { value: VerifyOptions; children: React.ReactNode; } const VerifyOptionRadio = ({ value, children }: VerifyOptionRadioProps) => ( <Radio variant="gray-card" width="fit-content" value={value} overflow="hidden" w="full" > {children} </Radio> );Also applies to: 45-93
113-113: Consider adding aria-label for better accessibility.The RadioGroup should have an aria-label to improve accessibility.
- <RadioGroup onChange={(val) => field.onChange(val)} value={field.value}> + <RadioGroup + onChange={(val) => field.onChange(val)} + value={field.value} + aria-label="Contract verification options" + >src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/ContractLibraries.tsx (1)
99-99: Consider adding a maximum limit for library entries.The current implementation allows unlimited library entries. Consider adding a maximum limit to prevent potential issues.
- isDisabled={fields.length === 1} + isDisabled={fields.length === 1 || fields.length >= 10}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)src/lib/components/forms/ControllerInput.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/ConstructorArgs.tsx(3 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/ContractLibraries.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyForms.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyOptions.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmVersionToTarget.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/OptimizerConfiguration.tsx(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidity.tsx(0 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityContractCode.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityFoundry.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityHardhat.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityJsonInput.tsx(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/index.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyper.tsx(0 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperContractCode.tsx(3 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperJsonInput.tsx(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperUploadFile.tsx(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/index.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helper.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx(6 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/types.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidity.tsx
- src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyper.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityFoundry.tsx
- src/lib/components/forms/ControllerInput.tsx
- src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/types.ts (1)
106-107: Review the use of empty strings for 'language' and 'option'Allowing empty strings for
languageandoptionmay lead to ambiguity or errors if not properly handled. Consider restricting these fields to their respective enums only or ensure the application can handle empty values gracefully.src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/index.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM!The Vyper components are correctly exported, facilitating their use throughout the application.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperJsonInput.tsx (2)
19-19: LGTM! Form field naming improvement.The updated form field name better reflects its purpose and maintains consistency with the component hierarchy.
37-40: LGTM! Enhanced type safety with generic parameters.Good use of generic type parameter and name prop for better type safety and form field organization.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityJsonInput.tsx (1)
19-19: LGTM! Consistent implementation with Vyper component.The changes mirror those in the Vyper component, maintaining consistency across the codebase while improving type safety and form organization.
Also applies to: 37-40
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperUploadFile.tsx (1)
20-20: LGTM! Comprehensive type safety improvements.Good implementation of generic type parameters and consistent naming across components. The file type restriction to
.vyfiles is correctly maintained.Also applies to: 38-45
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/OptimizerConfiguration.tsx (3)
2-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.Good organization of react-hook-form imports, bringing in necessary types for enhanced type safety.
11-13: LGTM! Strong typing with generics.Good use of generic type parameter with FieldValues constraint for better type safety and reusability.
16-19: Verify type assertions in template literals.While the implementation is good, let's ensure the type assertions with template literals are safe across all possible values of T.
Run this script to verify the usage:
Also applies to: 22-22, 25-28, 54-54
✅ Verification successful
Type assertions in template literals are properly implemented and type-safe
The type assertions are safe because:
- The generic type T is properly constrained with FieldValues
- The component is used with concrete type EvmContractVerifyForm
- The field paths match the form structure defined in types.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential type mismatches in form field access # Look for any usage of these field paths that might cause type errors # Search for optimizerConfig usage rg "optimizerConfig['\"]?\s*[,}]|optimizerConfig\." -t ts -t tsx # Search for type assertions with template literals rg "as FieldPath<\w+>" -t ts -t tsxLength of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Add tsx as a type and search for patterns rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' \ -U -t tsx -t ts \ 'optimizerConfig|as FieldPath<|OptimizerConfiguration' # Search for the component's usage to understand type context ast-grep --pattern 'OptimizerConfiguration[^a-zA-Z]'Length of output: 2854
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/vyper/EvmContractVerifyVyperContractCode.tsx (1)
55-62: LGTM: Generic component usage is correct.The usage of generic type parameters with
ConstructorArgsandEvmVersionToTargetcomponents is implemented correctly.src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/solidity/EvmContractVerifySolidityHardhat.tsx (1)
Line range hint
21-21: Verify the verifier URL configuration.The hardcoded verifier URL
https://eth-sepolia.blockscout.com/api/should be moved to chain configuration as indicated by the TODO comment.Consider adding the verifier URL to the chain configuration to make it configurable per network. This would improve maintainability and allow for easier network additions.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx (3)
56-58: LGTM! Form initialization looks good.The form's default values are now properly initialized using the helper function
getEvmContractVerifyFormDefaultValue, which provides better organization and maintainability.
208-215: LGTM! Language selection handling is well implemented.The language selection logic properly:
- Updates the language value
- Resets the compiler version
- Sets the appropriate verification option based on the selected language
241-248: LGTM! Verification form sections are properly structured.The new verification sections are well organized with:
- Conditional rendering based on language selection
- Proper component hierarchy using Stack and Divider
- Clear separation between options and forms
CHANGELOG.md (1)
42-42: LGTM! Changelog entry follows the standard format.The entry properly documents the addition of EVM contract verification with contract code under the Features section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/types.ts (2)
39-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance validation for contract libraries
The contract library schemas need additional validation:
- Library name should not be empty
- Library array should not be empty when enabled
Apply this diff to add the validations:
const zContractLibrary = z.object({ - name: z.string(), + name: z.string().min(1, "Library name is required"), address: zHexAddr20, }); const zContractLibraries = z.object({ enabled: z.boolean(), - value: z.array(zContractLibrary), + value: z.array(zContractLibrary).nonempty("At least one contract library is required"), });
104-105: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for compiler version and license type
These fields are essential for contract verification and should not be empty.
Apply this diff to add the validations:
- compilerVersion: z.string(), - licenseType: z.string(), + compilerVersion: z.string().min(1, "Compiler version is required"), + licenseType: z.string().min(1, "License type is required"),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helper.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/types.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helper.ts (3)
21-22: Avoid parsing empty strings for default addressesIn
CONTRACT_LIBRARIES_DEFAULT_VALUE, parsing an empty string for theaddressfield may lead to validation issues.Apply this diff to correct the default value:
- address: zHexAddr20.parse(""), + address: undefined,
30-32: Handle invalid contract addresses appropriatelyWhen
contractAddressQueryParamis invalid, parsing an empty string may lead to validation errors.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- contractAddress: isHex20Bytes(contractAddressQueryParam) - ? zHexAddr20.parse(contractAddressQueryParam) - : zHexAddr20.parse(""), + contractAddress: isHex20Bytes(contractAddressQueryParam) + ? zHexAddr20.parse(contractAddressQueryParam) + : undefined,
35-66: Well-structured form configuration with appropriate defaultsThe nested structure is well-organized, with separate configurations for different verification scenarios and appropriate default values. Setting
languageandoptiontoundefinedis better than using empty strings, as it makes the uninitialized state explicit.src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/types.ts (2)
10-18: Well-structured enum with clear language-specific options!The renamed enum with language-specific prefixes improves clarity and maintainability. The kebab-cased string values are good for API compatibility.
110-119: Well-organized form schema structure!The merge approach with language-specific form schemas is clean and type-safe. The naming consistency with enum values makes it easy to map options to their corresponding forms.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary, here are the updated release notes:
New Features
Improvements
Changes