feat: evm verification status modal, bar #1213
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
6 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of components and utilities for EVM contract verification status and details. The changes focus on enhancing the user interface for displaying contract verification information, including a new modal, verification process tracking, and updated components for contract details. The implementation provides a more detailed and interactive way to view verification statuses across different device types, with support for various verification states like not verified, in progress, failed, and verified. Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts (2)
29-29: Consider optimizing the order calculation.While the current implementation works well for this size, consider using a pre-computed map for order numbers if the set grows larger, as
Object.keys().indexOf()has O(n) complexity.+ const orderMap = Object.fromEntries( + Object.keys(licenseLabels).map((key, index) => [key, index + 1]) + ); - const orderNumber = Object.keys(licenseLabels).indexOf(license) + 1; + const orderNumber = orderMap[license] || 0;
3-6: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the function's purpose, parameters, and return value.
+ /** + * Formats a license type into a human-readable label with an optional order number. + * @param license - The EVM verification license type + * @param withOrderNumber - Whether to include the order number in the output + * @returns Formatted license label string + */ export const getLicenseTypeLabel = ( license: EVMVerifyLicenseType, withOrderNumber = true ) => {src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyProcessStepIcon.tsx (2)
5-41: Clean up switch statement and consider type safety improvements.The implementation is good, but has room for minor improvements:
- Remove the redundant "Pending" case as it's handled by default:
- case "Pending": default: return ( <Box
- Consider using a union type for better type safety:
type VerificationState = "Failed" | "Completed" | "In Progress" | "Pending"; export const EvmVerifyProcessStepIcon = ({ state }: { state: VerificationState }) => {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 25-25: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
13-24: Consider extracting shared styles to reduce duplication.The Box and Flex components share identical styling properties.
const commonStyles = { m: 1, w: "16px", minW: "16px", h: "16px", minH: "16px", background: "gray.800", borderRadius: "100%", border: "1px solid" }; // Then use like: <Flex {...commonStyles} borderColor="primary.main" /> <Box {...commonStyles} borderColor="gray.500" />Also applies to: 28-39
src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/VerifiedDetails.tsx (1)
24-34: Consider enhancing accessibility for the clickable text.The implementation looks clean and well-structured. Consider adding
role="button"andaria-labelto improve accessibility for screen readers.<Text as="span" cursor="pointer" + role="button" + aria-label="View source code" color="primary.main" transition="all 0.25s ease-in-out" _hover={{ textDecoration: "underline", textDecorationColor: "primary.light", }} onClick={handleNavigate} >src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/NotVerifiedDetails.tsx (2)
25-28: Extract common text content to avoid duplication.The text content is duplicated between mobile and desktop views. Consider extracting it to a constant.
+const NOT_VERIFIED_MESSAGE = + "This contract has not been verified. If you are the owner, you can " + + "verify it to allow other users to view the source code"; export const NotVerifiedDetails = ({ contractAddress, }: NotVerifiedDetailsProps) => { // ... if (isMobile) return ( <> <Text variant="body2" color="text.dark"> - This contract has not been verified. If you are the owner, you can - verify it to allow other users to view the source code + {NOT_VERIFIED_MESSAGE} </Text> // ... ); return ( <> <Text variant="body2" color="text.dark"> - This contract has not been verified. If you are the owner, you can{" "} + {NOT_VERIFIED_MESSAGE.replace(" verify it", "")}{" "} <Text as="span" // ... > verify it </Text> - to allow other users to view the source code </Text> // ... ); };Also applies to: 37-53
39-53: Consider unifying the navigation triggers.There are two separate elements triggering the same navigation. Consider wrapping them in a button group or similar component for better maintainability.
+import { ButtonGroup } from "@chakra-ui/react"; // ... return ( <> <Text variant="body2" color="text.dark"> {NOT_VERIFIED_MESSAGE.replace(" verify it", "")}{" "} </Text> + <ButtonGroup spacing={2}> <Text as="span" // ... (existing styles) > verify it </Text> <Button variant="ghost-primary" size="sm" onClick={handleNavigate}> Verify contract </Button> + </ButtonGroup> </> );Also applies to: 54-56
src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.tsx (2)
5-8: Clean up commented imports.Remove the commented-out imports if they are no longer needed. If they will be used in the future, add a TODO comment explaining when they will be needed.
-// import { FailedDetails } from "./FailedDetails"; -// import { IndirectlyVerifiedDetails } from "./IndirectlyVerifiedDetails"; -// import { InProgressDetails } from "./InProgressDetails";
24-26: Consider consolidating duplicate NotVerifiedDetails rendering.The
NotVerifiedDetailscomponent is rendered in two places with identical props. Consider moving the condition to avoid duplication.const EvmVerifySectionBody = ({ contractAddress, evmVerifyInfo, }: EvmVerifySectionProps) => { - if (!evmVerifyInfo) { - return <NotVerifiedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} />; - } - const { errorMessage, isVerified, submittedTimestamp } = evmVerifyInfo ?? {}; if (errorMessage) { return ( <FailedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} evmVerifyInfo={evmVerifyInfo} /> ); } if (isVerified) { return <VerifiedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} />; } if (submittedTimestamp) { return ( <InProgressDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} evmVerifyInfo={evmVerifyInfo} /> ); } return <NotVerifiedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} />; };Also applies to: 52-53
src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/FailedDetails.tsx (2)
30-33: Extract duplicate text to a constant.The failure message text is duplicated between mobile and desktop views. Consider extracting it to a constant.
+const FAILURE_MESSAGE = (timestamp: string) => + `Verification failed: Verification was submitted on ${timestamp} but an error occurred.`; export const FailedDetails = ({ contractAddress, evmVerifyInfo, }: FailedDetailsProps) => { // ... if (isMobile) return ( <> <Text variant="body2" color="text.dark"> - Verification failed: Verification was submitted on{" "} - {formatUTC(evmVerifyInfo.submittedTimestamp)} but an error occurred. + {FAILURE_MESSAGE(formatUTC(evmVerifyInfo.submittedTimestamp))} </Text> // ...Also applies to: 52-55
21-25: Consider extracting the route path to a constant.The route path
/evm-contracts/verifyshould be extracted to a constant to maintain consistency and ease updates.+const VERIFY_ROUTE = "/evm-contracts/verify"; export const FailedDetails = ({ // ... const handleNavigate = () => navigate({ - pathname: "/evm-contracts/verify", + pathname: VERIFY_ROUTE, query: { contractAddress }, });src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyProcess.tsx (2)
21-21: Replace magic numbers with semantic spacing tokens.The component uses magic numbers for spacing (
mt={4}andheight={4}). Consider using semantic spacing tokens for consistency.- <Flex direction="column" mt={4}> + <Flex direction="column" mt="spacingM"> // ... - <Box height={4} /> + <Box height="spacingM" />Also applies to: 50-50
32-32: Use semantic color tokens for better theme support.The component uses direct color values. Consider using semantic color tokens for better theme support and consistency.
- borderColor="gray.400" + borderColor="border.secondary" /> )} </Flex> <Flex direction="column"> <Text variant="body2" fontWeight={600} mt="2px"> {step.label} </Text> {step.errorMsg && ( - <Text variant="body3" color="error.main"> + <Text variant="body3" color="status.error"> {step.errorMsg} </Text> )} {step.state === "In Progress" && ( - <Text variant="body2" color="success.main"> + <Text variant="body2" color="status.success">Also applies to: 46-47, 60-61
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/index.tsx (1)
85-92: Extract onClick handler for better readability.Consider extracting the onClick handler to a separate function for improved maintainability.
export const EvmVerifyStatusModalWithTrigger = ({ triggerElement, contractAddress, evmVerifyInfo, }: EvmVerifyStatusModalTriggerProps) => { const { isOpen, onClose, onOpen } = useDisclosure(); + + const handleClick = (e: React.MouseEvent) => { + e.stopPropagation(); + onOpen(); + }; return ( <> - <Flex - onClick={(e) => { - e.stopPropagation(); - onOpen(); - }} - > + <Flex onClick={handleClick}> {triggerElement} </Flex>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/FailedDetails.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/InProgressDetails.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/NotVerifiedDetails.tsx(2 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/VerifiedDetails.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.ts(0 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyAlert.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyProcess.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyProcessStepIcon.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyRequestInfo.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/utils.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsOverview.tsx(3 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract-info/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/interact-evm-contract/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx(4 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/types.ts(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyFooter.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helpers.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx(4 hunks)src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/utils/verification/index.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyProcessStepIcon.tsx
[error] 25-25: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
🔇 Additional comments (35)
src/lib/utils/verification/index.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Clean barrel file implementation.The addition of the EVM module export follows the established pattern and maintains consistency with the existing exports.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helpers.ts (1)
3-4: LGTM! Clean refactor of license label functionality.The relocation of
getLicenseTypeLabelto a dedicated utils file improves code organization. The import and usage changes are consistent.Let's verify that all imports of getLicenseTypeLabel have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Refactoring verification complete - all imports updated correctly
The
getLicenseTypeLabelfunction is properly exported from utils/verification/evm.ts and correctly re-exported through the utils module. All imports and usages have been updated to use the new location.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining direct imports of getLicenseTypeLabel from helpers rg "from.*evm-contract-verify/helpers.*getLicenseTypeLabel" # Search for all current imports to ensure they're from lib/utils rg "import.*getLicenseTypeLabel.*from.*lib/utils"Length of output: 335
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation in lib/utils ast-grep --pattern 'export function getLicenseTypeLabel' # Search for any other usages of getLicenseTypeLabel rg "getLicenseTypeLabel" -g '!*.md'Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check re-export in lib/utils rg "export.*getLicenseTypeLabel" src/lib/utils/index.tsLength of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for export patterns in utils/index.ts cat src/lib/utils/index.ts # Look for other potential index files fd index.ts --exec grep -l "export.*getLicenseTypeLabel" {} \;Length of output: 1412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check verification directory structure and exports ls -la src/lib/utils/verification/ cat src/lib/utils/verification/index.tsLength of output: 470
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyFooter.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM! Simplified footer navigation.The static "Cancel" label and removal of navigation-related props align well with the shift towards a modal-based verification status approach.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/types.ts (2)
8-8: LGTM! Added ReadWrite tab for contract interaction.The addition of the ReadWrite tab enhances the contract interaction capabilities.
20-20: LGTM! Improved enum naming.The rename to EvmContractDetailsContractInfoTabs better reflects its specific purpose.
src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/InProgressDetails.tsx (1)
1-31: LGTM! Well-structured progress indicator component.The component provides clear user feedback about the verification process with:
- Informative message about potential duration
- Easy access to detailed status via modal
- Clean implementation using Chakra UI components
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyAlert.tsx (1)
31-38: Consider sanitizing error messages for display.The implementation looks solid. However, directly rendering error messages could potentially expose sensitive information or lead to XSS if the messages contain HTML/JS content.
Consider sanitizing the error message before display. Let's check if there's any error message sanitization in place:
✅ Verification successful
Error message handling is secure in this context
The error messages displayed in
EvmVerifyAlertare system-generated from trusted sources (API responses, contract interactions, and internal validation) and rendered through Chakra UI's Text component, which provides built-in content escaping. Additional sanitization is not necessary in this case.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error message sanitization patterns rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'sanitize|escape|purify|DOMPurify' src/Length of output: 578
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error message handling in EVM verification rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' -B 3 -A 3 'errorMsg.*=|setErrorMsg' src/Length of output: 6229
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/utils.ts (1)
18-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for edge cases in getProcessStep.
The function handles basic state transitions but might miss some edge cases:
- What happens if there's an error message but also a date?
- Should we validate that the date is not in the future?
Let's check if there's any timestamp validation elsewhere:
Consider adding validation:
const getProcessStep = ( date: Option<Date>, errorMsg: Option<string>, prevStepState?: ProcessStepState ) => { + // Validate date is not in the future + const isValidDate = date && date <= new Date(); + + // Error takes precedence over date + if (errorMsg) { + return { + state: ProcessStepState.FAILED, + errorMsg, + timestamp: isValidDate ? date : undefined, + }; + } if ( prevStepState === ProcessStepState.FAILED || prevStepState === ProcessStepState.PENDING || prevStepState === ProcessStepState.IN_PROGRESS ) return { state: ProcessStepState.PENDING, }; - if (date) + if (isValidDate) return { timestamp: date, state: ProcessStepState.COMPLETED, }; - if (errorMsg) - return { - state: ProcessStepState.FAILED, - errorMsg, - }; return { state: ProcessStepState.IN_PROGRESS, }; };src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.tsx (1)
55-72: LGTM! Well-structured responsive layout.The component handles mobile responsiveness well using the
useMobilehook and appropriate Chakra UI flex properties.src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts (1)
57-75: LGTM! Well-structured schema with proper optionality.The changes to make certain fields optional and the addition of
isVerifiedcomputed property improve the schema's flexibility while maintaining type safety.src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/FailedDetails.tsx (1)
14-72: LGTM! Well-structured component with good mobile support.The component handles both mobile and desktop views appropriately, with clear error messaging and proper navigation options.
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyProcess.tsx (2)
12-70: LGTM! Well-structured process visualization.The component effectively visualizes the verification process with good mobile support and clear step progression.
59-63: Ensure color contrast meets WCAG guidelines.When using colors to convey status (e.g., "In Progress" state), ensure sufficient color contrast for accessibility.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract-info/index.tsx (4)
13-17: LGTM! Clean interface and component declaration.The props interface is well-typed and the component name change improves clarity.
Also applies to: 18-24
24-29: LGTM! Clean state management.Good use of optional chaining for safe access to
evmVerifyInfo.isVerified.
33-36: LGTM! Clean render logic.The
EvmVerifySectioncomponent receives all required props.
Line range hint
37-71: LGTM! Clean conditional rendering.Good use of optional chaining and nullish coalescing for safe access to
contractPathandabi.src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyRequestInfo.tsx (3)
15-18: LGTM! Clean interface definition.The props interface is well-typed and clearly defines the component's requirements.
20-45: LGTM! Clean component structure.Good use of early return pattern for the unverified state, making the code more maintainable.
47-89: LGTM! Well-structured responsive design.Good use of Chakra UI's responsive props and consistent spacing throughout the component.
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/index.tsx (2)
23-28: LGTM! Clean interface definitions.Good use of TypeScript's Pick utility type for prop sharing between components.
Also applies to: 71-74
30-69: LGTM! Well-structured modal component.Good use of Chakra UI's modal components and responsive design.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsOverview.tsx (2)
52-52: LGTM! Clean hook usage.Good use of the
useEvmVerifyInfohook for fetching verification data.
56-59: LGTM! Clean component integration.The
EvmVerifySectioncomponent is well-integrated with the required props.src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/interact-evm-contract/index.tsx (3)
8-8: LGTM! New import for type safety.The addition of
TabIndeximport enhances type safety for tab-related operations.
14-16: LGTM! Updated path name to support tab navigation.The path name now includes a dynamic
[tab]segment, improving routing capabilities.
61-61: LGTM! Consistent tab handling in navigation.Both navigation callbacks now include the tab parameter, ensuring consistent routing behavior.
Also applies to: 80-80
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx (4)
28-28: LGTM! Component renamed for better clarity.The import statement reflects the renamed component
EvmContractDetailsContractInfo, which better describes its purpose.
75-76: LGTM! Added verification state.The
isVerifiedstate is correctly derived fromevmVerifyInfoto control feature visibility.
144-149: LGTM! Conditional Read/Write tab.The Read/Write tab is properly conditionally rendered based on the contract's verification status.
185-193: LGTM! New interaction panel.The InteractEvmContract component is properly integrated with necessary props for contract interaction.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx (3)
43-46: LGTM! Added necessary imports.The new imports support verification functionality and modal management.
97-99: LGTM! Modal state management.Using Chakra UI's
useDisclosurehook for modal state management.
272-277: LGTM! Added verification status modal.The EvmVerifyStatusModal is properly integrated with necessary props.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
42-42: LGTM! Well-documented changelog entry.The new feature is properly documented in the changelog with a reference to the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyAlert.tsx (1)
19-37: Consider usingbreak-wordfor better readability.The text styling is good, but consider changing
wordBreak="break-all"towordBreak="break-word"for better readability of error messages. The currentbreak-allmight break words at any character, whilebreak-wordwill try to break at word boundaries first.<Text variant="body3" color="error.main" - wordBreak="break-all" + wordBreak="break-word" lineHeight="normal" >src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyRequestInfo.tsx (1)
9-13: Consider extracting common text styles to a theme.The
baseTextStyleobject defines common text styles. Consider moving these styles to a theme configuration for better maintainability and consistency across components.-const baseTextStyle: TextProps = { - color: "text.dark", - variant: "body2", - whiteSpace: "nowrap", -};Add to your theme configuration:
// theme.ts export const theme = { components: { Text: { variants: { verifyInfoLabel: { color: "text.dark", variant: "body2", whiteSpace: "nowrap", } } } } }src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.tsx (1)
17-46: Simplify verification status handling.Based on past review comments, since
submittedTimestampis a required field in DB, we can simplify the status handling logic.const EvmVerifySectionBody = ({ contractAddress, evmVerifyInfo, }: EvmVerifySectionProps) => { if (!evmVerifyInfo) { return <NotVerifiedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} />; } - const { errorMessage, isVerified } = evmVerifyInfo; + const { errorMessage, isVerified, submittedTimestamp } = evmVerifyInfo; if (errorMessage) { return ( <FailedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} evmVerifyInfo={evmVerifyInfo} /> ); } if (isVerified) { return <VerifiedDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} />; } - return ( - <InProgressDetails - contractAddress={contractAddress} - evmVerifyInfo={evmVerifyInfo} - /> - ); + // Since submittedTimestamp is required, we can assume it's in progress + return <InProgressDetails contractAddress={contractAddress} evmVerifyInfo={evmVerifyInfo} />; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/VerifiedDetails.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyAlert.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyRequestInfo.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helpers.ts(2 hunks)src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- CHANGELOG.md
- src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/VerifiedDetails.tsx
- src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyAlert.tsx (3)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined interface.The imports are appropriate, and the interface is well-defined with a required prop, following React naming conventions.
8-15: LGTM! Well-structured component with responsive styling.The component is correctly defined with responsive styling for different breakpoints.
16-18: LGTM! Consistent error theme styling.The icon and color scheme appropriately convey the error state.
src/lib/components/modal/evm-verify-status/EvmVerifyRequestInfo.tsx (1)
20-90: LGTM! Well-structured component with good separation of concerns.The component:
- Handles both verified and unverified cases appropriately
- Uses responsive design with mobile considerations
- Properly types props and data
- Follows React best practices
src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts (1)
3-36: Consider using a mapping object for license labels.Previous review comments suggested simplifying this logic. A mapping object would be more maintainable and performant than a switch statement.
-export const getLicenseTypeLabel = (license: EVMVerifyLicenseType) => { - switch (license) { - case EVMVerifyLicenseType.None: - return "No License (None)"; - // ... other cases - default: - return ""; - } -}; +const LICENSE_TYPE_LABELS: Record<EVMVerifyLicenseType, string> = { + [EVMVerifyLicenseType.None]: "No License (None)", + [EVMVerifyLicenseType.Unlicense]: "The Unlicense (Unlicense)", + [EVMVerifyLicenseType.MIT]: "MIT License (MIT)", + // ... other mappings +}; + +export const getLicenseTypeLabel = (license: EVMVerifyLicenseType) => + LICENSE_TYPE_LABELS[license] ?? "";src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/index.tsx (1)
48-65: LGTM! Well-structured responsive layout.The component:
- Uses responsive design with mobile considerations
- Properly handles layout changes based on screen size
- Uses consistent styling with border and spacing
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/helpers.ts (1)
77-79: LGTM! Good use of centralized utility.The changes:
- Properly utilize the centralized
getLicenseTypeLabelutility- Add clear numerical prefixes to license options
- Maintain type safety with proper mapping
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts (1)
33-35: Improve default case error handling.Returning an empty string for unknown license types could lead to silent failures. Consider throwing an error or returning a more descriptive fallback.
default: - return ""; + throw new Error(`Unsupported license type: ${license}`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts(3 hunks)src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/lib/utils/verification/evm.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM!The import statement is clean and imports only the required type.
3-36: Implementation aligns with review feedback.The current implementation follows the suggested approach from past reviews:
- Uses a simple switch case for efficient mapping
- Provides clear, consistent labeling format (full name + abbreviation)
- Leverages TypeScript's type safety
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
FailedDetails,InProgressDetails,VerifiedDetails,EvmVerifyProcess, andEvmVerifyRequestInfo.EvmVerifySection.Improvements
Bug Fixes