Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve performance of the access logger when its disabled #9822

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

bdraco
Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco commented Nov 11, 2024

What do these changes do?

Most of the time in the access logger is spent calling clock_gettime, move the check to see if its enabled to an enabled property so we do not have to fetch time and throw it away.

Screenshot 2024-11-11 at 2 09 02 PM Screenshot 2024-11-11 at 2 18 35 PM

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

no

Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?

no

Most of the time in the access logger is spent calling clock_gettime,
move the check to see if its enabled to an enabled property so we do
not have to fetch time and throw it away
Most of the time in the access logger is spent calling clock_gettime,
move the check to see if its enabled to an enabled property so we do
not have to fetch time and throw it away
Most of the time in the access logger is spent calling clock_gettime,
move the check to see if its enabled to an enabled property so we do
not have to fetch time and throw it away
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 11, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9822 will not alter performance

Comparing access_logger_perf (0697774) with master (0f18900)

Summary

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks

@bdraco bdraco added the backport-3.11 Trigger automatic backporting to the 3.11 release branch by Patchback robot label Nov 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.70%. Comparing base (0f18900) to head (0697774).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9822   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.69%   98.70%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines       36015    36043   +28     
  Branches     4278     4282    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        35546    35575   +29     
  Misses        315      315           
+ Partials      154      153    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 98.59% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Linux 98.27% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Windows 96.06% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-macOS 97.35% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.10.11 97.19% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.10.15 97.75% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.11.10 97.80% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
Py-3.11.9 97.25% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.12.7 98.34% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.13.0 98.32% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.9.13 97.12% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.20 97.67% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
Py-pypy7.3.16 97.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-macos 97.35% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-ubuntu 98.27% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
VM-windows 96.06% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 11, 2024

Probably should make it _enabled since we don't want to document this externally

@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 11, 2024

OTOH logger tends to be expensive so an external logger might want to use this as well

docs/logging.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Nov 11, 2024
Copy link
Member

@asvetlov asvetlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe None access logger provides even less overhead?

@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 11, 2024

Maybe None access logger provides even less overhead?

Passing None to access_log in RequestHandler is definitely better but it lacks the ability to easily flip it on/off at run time. Home Assistant turns on aiohttp.access at run time when debugging is on so its still super nice to be able to flip it on and only incur the overhead of the logger.isEnabledFor on every request.

@bdraco bdraco marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2024 21:26
@bdraco bdraco requested a review from webknjaz as a code owner November 11, 2024 21:26
@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 11, 2024

Pushed access_logger_perf_sq_311 as a 3.11 test backport for testing on production

@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 11, 2024

Looks to be ~2.4% speed up in the overall request time.

aiohttp_get_profiler.zip

Copy link
Member

@asvetlov asvetlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got you. LGTM.

@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 12, 2024

Thanks for the look!

@bdraco bdraco merged commit 249df6e into master Nov 12, 2024
40 of 41 checks passed
@bdraco bdraco deleted the access_logger_perf branch November 12, 2024 14:48
Copy link
Contributor

patchback bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Backport to 3.11: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 249df6e on top of patchback/backports/3.11/249df6e1599db75a94dc95f63c498545358f6ef8/pr-9822

Backporting merged PR #9822 into master

  1. Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
    from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
  2. Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
    instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
    have it, here's how you can add it:
    $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp.git
  3. Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
    that will hold the backported code:
    $ git fetch upstream
    $ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.11/249df6e1599db75a94dc95f63c498545358f6ef8/pr-9822 upstream/3.11
  4. Now, cherry-pick PR Improve performance of the access logger when its disabled #9822 contents into that branch:
    $ git cherry-pick -x 249df6e1599db75a94dc95f63c498545358f6ef8
    If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 249df6e1599db75a94dc95f63c498545358f6ef8 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
    $ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 249df6e1599db75a94dc95f63c498545358f6ef8
  5. At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
    resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Improve performance of the access logger when its disabled #9822 as close to the
    original as possible.
  6. Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:
    $ git push origin patchback/backports/3.11/249df6e1599db75a94dc95f63c498545358f6ef8/pr-9822
  7. Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
    the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
    Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
    when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
    any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

bdraco added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
bdraco added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-3.11 Trigger automatic backporting to the 3.11 release branch by Patchback robot bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants