-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged data should consider origin to return early #45969
Conversation
Open in CodeSandbox Web Editor | VS Code | VS Code Insiders |
@glendaviesnz I wanted to gather your thoughts on whether this change is ok in terms of the spacing presets. What would be a good testing instructions for this change? |
* | ||
* @return WP_Theme_JSON | ||
*/ | ||
public static function get_merged_data( $origin = 'custom' ) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So depending on origin, this function is you more and less information. This is very confusing and even the comment doesnt help explain why this is done at all.
- default origin, gives you core data,
- blocks, gives you core data + block data,
- theme, gives you core data + block data + theme data
- custom give you core data + block data + theme data + user data.
First of all, this is confusing, as the naming seems a little off. Origin means what in this context? Why would you only want to load parts of this data? Why not load the lot?
Instead of param, why not function names, like
get_theme_data_for_blocks,
get_theme_data_for_user,
get_theme_data_for_theme.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First of all, this is confusing, as the naming seems a little off. Origin means what in this context? Why would you only want to load parts of this data? Why not load the lot?
That's how the domain works: depending on some context, we need one piece of data or another. Existing use cases are editor vs front-end, or themes with or without theme.json.
Instead of param, why not function names, like
Note that the way this is set up is prior to this PR. This PR only fixes the existing behavior. Whether this could have been done differently is out of scope for this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @spacedmonkey that it would be better to have separate functions (or even classes) for each type of origin:
$block_origin = new Gutenberg_Block_Origin();
$theme_data = $block_origin->get_theme_data();
or
$user_origin = new Gutenberg_User_Origin();
$theme_data = $user_origin->get_theme_data();
At the same time, I understand @oandregal 's point that the goal of this PR is mainly refactoring/optimization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a conversation separate from this PR. I also want to share my perspective on that: as a collective, we have limited number of hours to produce work, so I tend to favor work that has an impact on users or developer experience. Given this class is private and consumers should use the public methods (see), I'd personally refrain from refactoring for refactor's sake. If anything, we should aim to remove/deprecate these class (and its methods) entirely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, note that there already are separate methods to get the individual origins:
WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_core_data();
WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_theme_data();
WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_blocks_data();
WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_user_data();
The get_merged_data
method implements the algorithm that merges the sources together.
e5ac0a6
to
8f46778
Compare
At this point there is no way for a user to add a custom spacing scale, so we only need to test if the spacing scale from the core theme.json is generated as expected, and if spacing scale settings from a themes theme.json override the core ones. I tested the following with this PR and seems to be working as expected: ✅ With no theme settings the default 7 step spacing sizes show in block dimensions tools panel I don't particularly like the location of |
Ok, thanks. I need to look at this tomorrow (I'm from mobile now), though it sounds we need to recalculate the spacing at least for core, blocks (they can have any settings as part of their attributes, so I guess it also affect this?) and theme, but could get rid of the user.
We can look at this separately. A potential idea. If 1) all but the user origin need this computation and 2) we only compute this if the incoming data has new spacing settings, could we perhaps look at absorbing this in the merge method by doing something along these lines (pseudo-code): function merge( $incoming ) {
// an some point at the end
if ( $incoming_has_spacing_settings ) {
// Do the scale calculation.
}
} |
At the moment it is only possible to have |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice to have some PHP unit tests for this new static method.
* | ||
* @return WP_Theme_JSON | ||
*/ | ||
public static function get_merged_data( $origin = 'custom' ) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @spacedmonkey that it would be better to have separate functions (or even classes) for each type of origin:
$block_origin = new Gutenberg_Block_Origin();
$theme_data = $block_origin->get_theme_data();
or
$user_origin = new Gutenberg_User_Origin();
$theme_data = $user_origin->get_theme_data();
At the same time, I understand @oandregal 's point that the goal of this PR is mainly refactoring/optimization.
8f46778
to
baeebd2
Compare
This is not a new method, it is part of WordPress since 5.9 and before that in the plugin. I've added a bunch of tests to cover this behavior. |
00c27c9
to
795319a
Compare
@oandregal, I must have been overlooking something as when I retested today the spacing sizes were not being generated in themes that did not have their own settings in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the tests, @oandregal.
I've added my notes.
Also, it should be possible to merge these 4 test methods into a single test method and use the data provider.
The only parameter that get changed across these tests is the argument of the WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg::get_merged_data()
method.
@anton-vlasenko How do you run a single test using the data provider? Happy to use it if there's an easy way to run individual tests, otherwise, that setup requires a lot of manual intervention to do something that simple. |
Co-authored-by: Anton Vlasenko <43744263+anton-vlasenko@users.noreply.github.com>
782563f
to
75c1202
Compare
Thanks, Glen! |
@anton-vlasenko taugh me how to run a single dataset: you append npm run test:unit:php -- --filter test_get_merged_data_returns_origin@origin_default Runs the In the past, I had tried with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 🎉
… inheriting per WordPress version (#46750) * Backport WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver from core as it is * Substitute WP_Theme_JSON by WP_Theme_JSON_Gutenberg * Substitute WP_Theme_JSON_Data by WP_Theme_JSON_Data_Gutenberg * Rename WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver to WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base The goal is to use it as base to inherit from, until we are able to remove all the children. * Make WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_6_1 inherit from WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base * 6.1: remove field already defined in base class * 6.1: remove translate, it is equal to base method * 6.1: remove get_core_data, it does not have base changes * 6.1: remove get_user_data Missed core changes and does not do anything differently from core. * 6.1: remove get_user_data_from_wp_global_styles It misses core changes and does not do anything differently. * 6.2: inherit from WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base instead of 6.1 This makes the WP_Theme_JSON_Resover_6_1 class unused. * 6.1: remove class no longer in use * 6.2: deprecate theme_has_support #45380 * 6.2: substitute WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::theme_has_support by wp_theme_has_theme_json() #45168 * 6.2: port changes to get_user_data_from_wp_global_styles #46043 * 6.2: update get_merged_data #45969 * 6.2: remove get_user_data Same code as core. There's a check for detecting whether the class is an instance of WP_Theme_JSON_Gutenberg that was not ported. This check was introduced to make sure the cache of the core class didn't interfere with the cache of the Gutenberg class, so it's no longer necessary. See #42756 * experimental: make it inherit from WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base * 6.2: remove class no longer in use * experimental: delete remove_json_comments It's already part of the base class. * experimental: remove get_block_data It's already part of the base class and it didn't have the changes from core. * experimental: appearanceTools Port changes to the base class that were meant to be part of 6.1. See #43337 * experimental: port webfonts (experimental API) see #37140 * experimental: use gutenberg_get_legacy_theme_supports_for_theme_json #46112 * experimental: get_theme_data, all code is in the base class * experimental: remove empty class * Rename WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base to WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg * Fix lint issue: rename class-wp-theme-json-resolver.php to class-wp-theme-json-resolver-gutenberg.php * Move theme.json to unversioned lib/ * Move theme-i18n.json to unversioned lib/
… inheriting per WordPress version (#46750) * Backport WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver from core as it is * Substitute WP_Theme_JSON by WP_Theme_JSON_Gutenberg * Substitute WP_Theme_JSON_Data by WP_Theme_JSON_Data_Gutenberg * Rename WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver to WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base The goal is to use it as base to inherit from, until we are able to remove all the children. * Make WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_6_1 inherit from WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base * 6.1: remove field already defined in base class * 6.1: remove translate, it is equal to base method * 6.1: remove get_core_data, it does not have base changes * 6.1: remove get_user_data Missed core changes and does not do anything differently from core. * 6.1: remove get_user_data_from_wp_global_styles It misses core changes and does not do anything differently. * 6.2: inherit from WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base instead of 6.1 This makes the WP_Theme_JSON_Resover_6_1 class unused. * 6.1: remove class no longer in use * 6.2: deprecate theme_has_support #45380 * 6.2: substitute WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::theme_has_support by wp_theme_has_theme_json() #45168 * 6.2: port changes to get_user_data_from_wp_global_styles #46043 * 6.2: update get_merged_data #45969 * 6.2: remove get_user_data Same code as core. There's a check for detecting whether the class is an instance of WP_Theme_JSON_Gutenberg that was not ported. This check was introduced to make sure the cache of the core class didn't interfere with the cache of the Gutenberg class, so it's no longer necessary. See #42756 * experimental: make it inherit from WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base * 6.2: remove class no longer in use * experimental: delete remove_json_comments It's already part of the base class. * experimental: remove get_block_data It's already part of the base class and it didn't have the changes from core. * experimental: appearanceTools Port changes to the base class that were meant to be part of 6.1. See #43337 * experimental: port webfonts (experimental API) see #37140 * experimental: use gutenberg_get_legacy_theme_supports_for_theme_json #46112 * experimental: get_theme_data, all code is in the base class * experimental: remove empty class * Rename WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Base to WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg * Fix lint issue: rename class-wp-theme-json-resolver.php to class-wp-theme-json-resolver-gutenberg.php * Move theme.json to unversioned lib/ * Move theme-i18n.json to unversioned lib/
Part of #45171
Related #45971
What?
This makes the
WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_merged_data
consider the origin the consumers wants to retrieve, preventing it from calculating data consumers don't need.Why?
This PR is a preparation for #45372 and other public high-level methods. The consumer should be responsible to know which origin needs to be queried, and the resolver should return data based on that.
How?
get_merged_data
method use the$origin
parameter and bail early.Testing Instructions