Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(history_message): create a dedicated GUI control #539

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 16, 2025

Conversation

clementb49
Copy link
Collaborator

@clementb49 clementb49 commented Feb 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved the conversation view with streamlined message removal and enhanced accessibility, delivering a clearer and more cohesive messaging experience.
    • Introduced an upgraded message history panel with robust navigation, search, and user-friendly context menu options for managing conversations.
  • Refactor
    • Consolidated message display and accessibility handling to improve overall performance and consistency in user interactions.
    • Simplified context menu options for message operations.

@clementb49 clementb49 marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2025 15:19
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request refactors conversation message handling in the Basilisk GUI. The ConversationTab class now removes the redundant message_segment_manager in favor of using a consolidated messages attribute. A new method, remove_message_block, has been introduced to streamline message block removal and update accessible output. Additionally, a new HistoryMsgTextCtrl class extending wx.TextCtrl has been added to manage conversation history, providing message navigation, search capabilities, and enhanced accessibility features.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py - Removed message_segment_manager and its related methods.
- Refactored message handling to use the messages attribute.
- Introduced remove_message_block to centralize message removal logic.
- Updated accessible output and speech stream handling methods.
basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py - Added the HistoryMsgTextCtrl class (subclass of wx.TextCtrl).
- Implemented message navigation, search, and context menu operations.
- Integrated accessibility features for conversation history display.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • AAClause

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22ea2e5 and c7cb797.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (10 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build_app / build_windows (x64)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (4)

199-199: Consider making the control size configurable.

This is a duplicate of a previous review comment suggesting to make the control size configurable or dynamic to better accommodate different screen sizes and user preferences.


343-346: Avoid using a non-callable default for event handling.

This is a duplicate of a previous review comment suggesting to avoid passing wx.KeyEvent.Skip to actions.get and instead skip the event when no action is found.


1302-1304: Well-structured accessibility improvements!

The sequential handling of stream buffer, speech stream, and segment length updates improves the accessibility experience.


1413-1420: Handle potential ValueError when removing message blocks.

This is a duplicate of a previous review comment suggesting to handle the case when the message block is not found in the conversation messages list.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ca7378 and 63b6307.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (10 hunks)
  • basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (2)

32-32: Validate usage of both local and global accessible_output.

You import get_accessible_output here and also call it at line 58 to assign accessible_output. Verify you need both references or remove one to avoid confusion.


195-195: Good use of the new HistoryMsgTextCtrl.

Replacing the old message display with HistoryMsgTextCtrl neatly consolidates message handling and improves readability.

Comment on lines +80 to +81
self.Bind(wx.EVT_KEY_DOWN, self.on_key_down)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider removing horizontal scrolling when word wrapping is enabled.

Having both wx.TE_WORDWRAP and wx.HSCROLL can lead to unexpected behavior because word wrapping typically makes horizontal scrolling unnecessary.

- style=wx.TE_MULTILINE | wx.TE_READONLY | wx.TE_WORDWRAP | wx.HSCROLL,
+ style=wx.TE_MULTILINE | wx.TE_READONLY | wx.TE_WORDWRAP,

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 63b6307 and f79bc53.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build_app / build_windows (x64)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py (4)

63-69: Consider removing horizontal scrolling when word wrapping is enabled.

Having both wx.TE_WORDWRAP and wx.HSCROLL can lead to unexpected behavior because word wrapping typically makes horizontal scrolling unnecessary.

-            style=wx.TE_MULTILINE
-            | wx.TE_READONLY
-            | wx.TE_WORDWRAP
-            | wx.HSCROLL,
+            style=wx.TE_MULTILINE
+            | wx.TE_READONLY
+            | wx.TE_WORDWRAP,

330-364: Well-implemented navigation with proper error handling!

The navigation methods are well-structured with appropriate error handling and user feedback through wx.Bell().


415-448: Search functionality is well-implemented with lazy initialization.

The search implementation is clean and efficient, with proper handling of search directions and dialog state.


596-643: Excellent implementation of keyboard shortcuts!

The keyboard shortcuts implementation is clean, maintainable, and well-documented. The use of a dictionary for key actions makes it easy to add or modify shortcuts.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (1)

343-346: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure a proper default event-skipping flow.
Currently, if the shortcut is not found in actions, action becomes wx.KeyEvent.Skip (a method), and action(event) may not function as intended. Typically, you’d do either if not action: event.Skip() or a no-op.

- action = actions.get(shortcut, wx.KeyEvent.Skip)
- action(event)
+ action = actions.get(shortcut, None)
+ if action is None:
+     event.Skip()
+     return
+ action(event)
basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py (1)

148-193: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Potential missing check for cleared weak references.
You create a weakref to new_block but never confirm if new_block_ref() remains valid before usage. This could cause issues if garbage collection has occurred.

 def display_new_block(self, new_block: MessageBlock):
     ...
     new_block_ref = weakref.ref(new_block)
+    if new_block_ref() is None:
+        logger.warning("Message block reference lost.")
+        return
     ...
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f79bc53 and 22ea2e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (9 hunks)
  • basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build_app / build_windows (x64)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
basilisk/gui/conversation_tab.py (8)

32-32: Import looks good.
No concerns regarding importing get_accessible_output.


52-52: Module import is appropriate.
Bringing in HistoryMsgTextCtrl aligns with the new dedicated control approach.


929-929: New usage of display_new_block is appropriate.
This refactor centralizes message display logic into HistoryMsgTextCtrl.


1273-1273: Block display integration looks good.
Seamless addition of a new block into the HistoryMsgTextCtrl.


1285-1285: Smooth streaming integration.
Appends incremental response chunks via append_stream_chunk.


1294-1294: Accessible output call is clear.
Delegating speech/braille output to the specialized text control is a solid design choice.


1302-1304: Efficient finalization of streaming.
Flushing stream buffer, handling speech details, and updating segment length ensures consistency in the UI and accessibility.


1316-1317: Handling final message display and accessible output.
Properly calls display_new_block and handle_accessible_output, ensuring the response is both visible and accessible.

basilisk/gui/history_msg_text_ctrl.py (4)

1-4: Module-level docstring is clear.
Describes the new custom text control’s purpose and functionality coherently.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)


95-99: Custom Clear method is well-structured.
Calling super().Clear() and resetting segment_manager is consistent and straightforward.


477-487: Toggle speak stream flow is concise.
Deferring the actual toggling ensures no race condition within event handling.


720-737: Key binding dictionary is well-structured.
Centralizing shortcuts fosters maintainability. Just ensure that any unsupported keys gracefully fall through.

@AAClause AAClause merged commit 763ed7d into master Feb 16, 2025
9 checks passed
@AAClause AAClause deleted the refactoHistoryMessage branch February 16, 2025 22:30
@clementb49 clementb49 added this to the 0.1a10 milestone Feb 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants