DLRS as CMD vs CO types

[jmontgomery23]

Hi -- I recently updated our DLRS tool to v2.22, but I still have some DLRS as Custom objects, and not as Custom Metadata. Is that a problem? Will the DLRS that are CO still work? If so, do we know when all DLRS will have to be migrated to CMD?

thanks-Joy

[aheber]

DLRS still supports the CO (Custom Object) data versions but the editor interfaces for editing the CMDT (Custom Metadata) don't work with the CO records (this has always been the case, native record editing for CO and custom editors for CMDTs)

If DLRS ever drops support for COs I fully expect it will be a major release change such as a 3.0 release.

There are growing set of features that the CMDT add over time that the CO will never get. No rush to upgrade though.

[jmontgomery23]

Thanks very much for your quick reply!!

…

________________________________ From: Heber ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 4:46 PM To: SFDO-Community/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries ***@***.***> Cc: Joy Montgomery ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [SFDO-Community/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries] DLRS as CMD vs CO types (Discussion #1512) DLRS still supports the CO (Custom Object) data versions but the editor interfaces for editing the CMDT (Custom Metadata) don't work with the CO records (this has always been the case, native record editing for CO and custom editors for CMDTs) If DLRS ever drops support for COs I fully expect it will be a major release change such as a 3.0 release. There are growing set of features that the CMDT add over time that the CO will never get. No rush to upgrade though. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1512 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BA5CO2HC77CHZF2ONKPN5X32JL2URAVCNFSM6AAAAABUWMX7WCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZVGQYTIMY>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>