Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(do): do will now handle an observer as an argument #477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2015
Merged

feat(do): do will now handle an observer as an argument #477

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2015

Conversation

benlesh
Copy link
Member

@benlesh benlesh commented Oct 7, 2015

  • also shored up tests around do a little more

closes #476

@staltz
Copy link
Member

staltz commented Oct 7, 2015

👍

1 similar comment
@luisgabriel
Copy link
Contributor

👍

- also shored up tests around do a little more

closes #476
@benlesh benlesh merged commit c1a4994 into ReactiveX:master Oct 7, 2015
@benlesh benlesh deleted the do_observer branch April 27, 2016 17:14
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 7, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 7, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing doOn* operators
3 participants