-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add VPs to SOECP #4375
Merged
Merged
Add VPs to SOECP #4375
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1bd7a42
add VP to SOECP and remove block, not used yet
camelto2 11ecf2d
refactor and add VPs to SOECPComponent
camelto2 301a563
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into VP_SOECP
camelto2 5252636
fix VP to include spin update, update tests
camelto2 7663f88
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into VP_SOECP
camelto2 d4974a5
enable VP and fix makeClone
camelto2 f35e2d9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into VP_SOECP
camelto2 9d6d295
remote batched algo from tests since they are default
camelto2 bfa4ce6
update error message
camelto2 745501d
missed unit test change for VP
camelto2 b889478
change VP.makeMoves(WithSpin) to only pass pos and spin
camelto2 8d5da52
fix mixed type issue
camelto2 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not getting why
spins
needs to be updated. When not using spinor, Should the whole run not depending on the value of spins? Will there be any issue if we keep makeMoves untouched?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not for normal calculations. But for calculations that do include spinors yes it is needed. We still have NonLocalECPs used in spinor calculations, so if those evaluateRatios don't use VPs that have up to date spin values, the ratio evaluations are wrong
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically, if we don't have spinors then the original behavior of makeMoves would be fine. But if we do have spinors, then I need it to also have up to date spins (but no actual displacement from their original values).
I wasn't sure of the best way to handle this. Thats why I originally just passed the particleset by reference so I could hide the update inside VP instead of having to pass both the pos and spin as arguments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, if I don't keep the spins up to date in NonLocalECPComponent, then I get the following
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the info and I have a better picture now. I will make a follow up PR to consolidate APIs.