-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Reviewed] PV horizontal tracking #293
Conversation
I suggest we use 'dual' tracking instead of 'vh', as it's a bit more clear.
The equations don't need to be changed. The 'surface_orientation['slope']' for horizontal tracking (where the slope changes through the day) is calculated in the Orientation.py script.
Also update assertion error
Pv horizontal tracking
PV horizontal tracking
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #293 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 72.80% 73.06% +0.26%
==========================================
Files 19 19
Lines 1625 1641 +16
Branches 277 279 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 1183 1199 +16
Misses 366 366
Partials 76 76
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be nice to have a bit more sensible plot in the example notebook. Perhaps something like
- one summer week
- yearly total
Great @FabianHofmann! Let's tackle it later. The graphic and average capacity factors for May already illustrate the idea. |
Same as #255 but with one additional commit.
Cleaned-up example notebook.