type annotations in stubs created from docs #1815
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ing up and so does the formatting of the signatures)
…d imports to avoid type errors
ljeub-pometry
force-pushed
the
feature/TypeAnnotations
branch
from
7829072 to
c89d207
Compare
miratepuffin
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2024
This was referenced Oct 15, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extract type annotations for python from doc strings when generating the stub files
Why are the changes needed?
Actual types in the stubs
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? If yes is this documented?
How was this patch tested?
Issues
Are there any further changes required?
Need to clean up the docs and signature formatting