Snapshot at/latest #1832
Merged
Snapshot at/latest #1832
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
miratepuffin
requested changes
Oct 18, 2024
miratepuffin
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds two new window functions
snapshot_atandsnapshot_latestWhy are the changes needed?
These two new functions are needed for those cases where users work with graphs that might be event or persistent and they just want to get all of those entities that have not been deleted at some point in time, which corresponds to
before(t+1)for event graphs andatfor persistent graphs.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? If yes is this documented?
Yes, docs were added to rust and python
How was this patch tested?
A snapshot test was added to
raphtory/src/db/api/view/time.rsAre there any further changes required?
No