[v0.40.0 QA] PL Improvements #6773
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andrijapau
changed the title
andrijapau
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v0.40.0-rc0 #6773 +/- ##
==============================================
Coverage ? 99.60%
==============================================
Files ? 476
Lines ? 45232
Branches ? 0
==============================================
Hits ? 45055
Misses ? 177
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
andrijapau
changed the title
lillian542
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context:
Source-code improvements found during the v0.40 quality assurance process.
Documentation focused improvements are addressed in #6774.
Description of the Change:
A few things were adjusted in this PR,
Bosonic Operators
BoseXandFermiXare now both top-level (as suggested by product).BoseXnow raises aTypeError(instead of aValueErrorfor an inappropriate operator type (was suggested in the original PR but was never implemented).