[QA] v0.40 Release Improvements #6772
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
|
andrijapau
changed the title
|
Branch has protections by accident, closing for: #6773 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v0.40.0-rc0 #6772 +/- ##
==============================================
Coverage ? 99.60%
==============================================
Files ? 476
Lines ? 45232
Branches ? 0
==============================================
Hits ? 45055
Misses ? 177
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context:
Sources of error found during the v0.40 quality assurance process.
Description of the Change:
A few things were adjusted in this PR,
Bosonic Operators
BoseXwas top-level butFermiXwas not (adjusted in this PR).BoseXraised aValueErrorrather than aTypeErrorfor an inappropriate input (was suggested in the original PR but was never implemented).