Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restrict fuzzing to reform-affected filing units #1976

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2018
Merged

Restrict fuzzing to reform-affected filing units #1976

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2018

Conversation

martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

@martinholmer martinholmer commented Apr 18, 2018

This pull request simplifies, accelerates, and strengthens the fuzzing of PUF results in each table cell. It does this by selecting the three filing units to fuzz from those filing units whose combined taxes are affected by the reform (not from those whose income tax liability is sensitive to a dollar increase in earnings under current-law policy).

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 18, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1976 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1976   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files          38      38           
  Lines        3755    3755           
======================================
  Hits         3755    3755

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce37b17...edd259b. Read the comment docs.

@martinholmer martinholmer merged commit f978987 into PSLmodels:master Apr 19, 2018
@martinholmer martinholmer deleted the fuzz-reform-affected branch April 19, 2018 22:01
@martinholmer martinholmer removed the ready label May 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants