Refined intergration to Claude AI

[totargaming]

•   const allowedModels = ['claude-3-opus-20240229', 'claude-3-sonnet-20240229', 'claude-3-haiku-20240307'];
  

• claude-3-sonnet-20240229: is not valid model
• claude-3-opus-20240229: bloody expensive compared to claude-3-7-sonnet-latest
  => const allowedModels = ['claude-3-7-sonnet-latest', 'claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022', 'claude-3-haiku-20240307'];

I used replaced all to substitute in the models, and tested it just fine :)

[dev-opsss]

All the models are Valid models, Not sure where you are checking but using latest is not advised even in anthropic documentation: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models/all-models#model-names

[totargaming]

All the models are Valid models, Not sure where you are checking but using latest is not advised even in anthropic documentation: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models/all-models#model-names

• The problem arose when I tried to use: claude-3-sonnet-20240229, can you please test that model again?. the equivalent can be claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022
• I have changed 3 tier, claude-3-7-sonnet-latest for anyone want to use latest, its not recommended because the rate and price is subject to change, but I think we all expect to get up to date model. The second tier which is 3.5 is opt-in for user who dont want to have up-to-date model though :)

[totargaming]

All the models are Valid models, Not sure where you are checking but using latest is not advised even in anthropic documentation: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models/all-models#model-names

• The problem arose when I tried to use: claude-3-sonnet-20240229, can you please test that model again?. the equivalent can be claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022
• I have changed 3 tier, claude-3-7-sonnet-latest for anyone want to use latest, its not recommended because the rate and price is subject to change, but I think we all expect to get up to date model. The second tier which is 3.5 is opt-in for user who dont want to have up-to-date model though :) Opus is more inefficient imo

[bhaumikmaan]

Let's discuss here #55 and come back to this PR once done

[dev-opsss]

LGTM 🚢

[bhaumikmaan]

Hey
Let's answer #55 @dev-opsss @totargaming
else let's ship

[bhaumikmaan]

LGTM. Thanks for your contribution

[us1415]

Saw that @dev-opsss had already approved. Approving for him so we could merge.