-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
Opinions: Claude Sonnet VS Opus #55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I agree with this, would having these two together be the best idea? or only one of these. |
See, there's 2 views to this:
So your call to implement How I would like to ship the PR is that we decide on a version i.e. Opus or Sonnet and close the PR there |
We can for now ship with the sonnet 3.7 as its faster, Users always have an option to make the changes based on what they want. i tried with opus it works flawlessly, at the same time sonnet is also doing great If we compare the token, Sonnet is the best one to understand the problem. If user is expecting complex problem they can use Opus for that. but having sonnet as primary will not cause any issues. it is not a bad model. Token Limits Comparison Claude 3.7 Sonnet:
Claude 3 Opus:
|
Cool, sounds good to me |
Following #53 and discussion b/w code owners @dev-opsss & @totargaming
Let's discuss which of the 2 models we should have UNLESS we want both and can implement it flawlessly.
My 2 cents are
-latest
at all because we want to use stable versionsNow the question remains whether or not to use Claude opus or upgrade to sonnet
How I see it, is as a tradeoff of speed and price to correct solutions
Where I would prefer to choose correct solutions + opus is safe and reliable and tested.
Although Sonnet has advantages, we can add it as a choice or something, but it would make the code a bit shabby.
Opinions welcome
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: