Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove references to ADAMS coupling #1426

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hkross
Copy link
Contributor

@hkross hkross commented Jan 31, 2023

This pull request is ready to be merged.

Changes are complete and all regression tests pass.

Feature or improvement description

This pull request removes references to ADAMS coupling in the code. References to ADAMS remain in AeroSubs.f90, which will be deprecated with AeroDyn14. Some outputs related to ADAMS coupling remain as well, since multiple regression tests reference these outputs, and removing them would require updating these baselines.

Impacted areas of the software

-ElastoDyn
-IceFloe

@hkross
Copy link
Contributor Author

hkross commented Jan 31, 2023

@jjonkman and @andrew-platt, as noted in the PR description, I did not remove the ElastoDyn outputs related to ADAMS since multiple regression tests use these outputs (though they are zero for all). Removing them would require updating the baselines for these regression tests. I can remove them if that would be preferable.

@andrew-platt andrew-platt self-assigned this Jan 31, 2023
@andrew-platt andrew-platt self-requested a review January 31, 2023 21:58
@andrew-platt andrew-platt added this to the v4.0.0 milestone Jan 31, 2023
@andrew-platt
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll remove the Adams output channels with the AD14 deprecation PR (there are some regression test updates with it).

@andrew-platt andrew-platt merged commit 7967f39 into OpenFAST:dev Jan 31, 2023
@hkross hkross deleted the f/ADAMSremove branch February 1, 2023 03:55
@andrew-platt andrew-platt mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2024
38 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants