Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Go][Experimental] Allow retrieving the underlying configuration for APIClient #4195

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2019

Conversation

wing328
Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 commented Oct 21, 2019

Allow retrieving the underlying configuration for APIClient

Ref: #3976

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • If contributing template-only or documentation-only changes which will change sample output, build the project before .
  • Run the shell script(s) under ./bin/ (or Windows batch scripts under.\bin\windows) to update Petstore samples related to your fix. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit, and these must match the expectations made by your contribution. You only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh, ./bin/openapi3/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the code or mustache templates for a language ({LANG}) (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc).
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 4.1.x, 5.0.x. Default: master.
  • Copy the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

cc @antihax (2017/11) @bvwells (2017/12) @grokify (2018/07) @kemokemo (2018/09) @bkabrda (2019/07)

@wing328 wing328 added this to the 4.2.0 milestone Oct 21, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@bkabrda bkabrda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@wing328 wing328 merged commit 90c7f53 into master Oct 21, 2019
@wing328 wing328 deleted the go-exp-config branch October 23, 2019 02:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants