Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simple Color Schemes #630

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Feb 25, 2021
Merged

Simple Color Schemes #630

merged 33 commits into from
Feb 25, 2021

Conversation

samirmansour
Copy link
Contributor

This implementation of terminal schemes does not require reconnection-improvements to work.

@ericfranz
Copy link
Contributor

In public/themes/ you store the .terminal versions. Did you use these to generate the theme values in public/javascripts/themes.js? Are there other formats for the themes that produce the same values? Some of the other theme formats store human readable forms of the colors, which might be nice when versioning, but it wasn't apparent to me whether https://github.com/mbadolato/iTerm2-Color-Schemes/tree/master/schemes or Xresources or vscode or another format had all the values you needed (vs code seemed to miss things like bold and cursor etc.) It isn't as important as the licenses and maybe in the README a link to the source where these were copied.

Copy link
Contributor

@johrstrom johrstrom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems OK to me. I like the addition of whole profiles which we may be able to add to later on.

@ericfranz ericfranz merged commit 84aaf02 into master Feb 25, 2021
@ericfranz ericfranz deleted the client-side-color-scheme branch February 25, 2021 20:52
@ericfranz ericfranz added this to the OOD2.0 milestone Feb 25, 2021
@ericfranz ericfranz mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants