Detect dns opcode range 5446 v3

[catenacyber]

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/5446

Describe changes:

• make keyword dns.opcode use helper for integers so that they can have all features such as range
• integer keywords now accept negated range

#9929 with doc updated a bit

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9945 (4a49352) into master (9c3ab36) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 95.18%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9945      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.35%   82.31%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         972      972              
  Lines      273060   273046      -14     
==========================================
- Hits       224870   224763     -107     
- Misses      48190    48283      +93     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	64.10% <70.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
suricata-verify	61.05% <70.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests	62.92% <87.95%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[suricata-qa]

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 16831

[victorjulien]

Looks good to me. Needs a rebase though.

[catenacyber]

Does the first commit deserve its own ticket ?

[catenacyber]

Rebased in #10073