Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Misc/v1 #9313

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Misc/v1 #9313

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

victorjulien
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Normalize the timestamps that are too far in the past to epoch.

Bug: OISF#6240.
Data on RST packets is not invalid, but also shouldn't be used
in reassembly.

RFC 1122:

  4.2.2.12  RST Segment: RFC-793 Section 3.4

    A TCP SHOULD allow a received RST segment to include data.

    DISCUSSION
        It has been suggested that a RST segment could contain
        ASCII text that encoded and explained the cause of the
        RST.  No standard has yet been established for such
        data.

RST data will be presented to the detection engine per packet,
but will not be part of stream reassembly.

Bug: OISF#6244.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #9313 (ee739c5) into master (427d2a7) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9313      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.41%   82.39%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         968      968              
  Lines      274055   274064       +9     
==========================================
- Hits       225872   225818      -54     
- Misses      48183    48246      +63     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.64% <85.71%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 60.86% <78.57%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
unittests 62.91% <21.42%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 15468

Copy link
Member

@jasonish jasonish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me. Is ther an S-V test for the data on reset cases?

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member Author

Merged in #9320, thanks!

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member Author

Looks OK to me. Is ther an S-V test for the data on reset cases?

OISF/suricata-verify#1344

@victorjulien victorjulien deleted the misc/v1 branch August 12, 2023 06:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants