Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

next/268/20240125/v1 #10240

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

victorjulien
Copy link
Member

"sigerror_ok" and "sigerror_requires" were not being reset after each
rule which could lead to a rule load error being incorrectly tracked
as skipped rather than failed.

Also initialize "skippedsigs" to 0 along with "goodsigs" and
"badsigs", while not directly related to this issue, could also throw
off some stats.

Ticket: OISF#6710
Copy link
Member

@inashivb inashivb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@inashivb
Copy link
Member

Should we have requirements update here too?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3cb7112) 82.18% compared to head (8bf8131) 78.14%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10240      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.18%   78.14%   -4.04%     
==========================================
  Files         977      977              
  Lines      271894   271707     -187     
==========================================
- Hits       223465   212337   -11128     
- Misses      48429    59370   +10941     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.37% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️
suricata-verify ?
unittests 62.81% <66.66%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member Author

missing requirements PR

@victorjulien victorjulien deleted the next/268/20240125/v1 branch January 25, 2024 08:46
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member Author

Should we have requirements update here too?

Yes, was meant to be part of this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants