Workflow #275
Workflow #275
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThis update introduces an ESLint configuration for improved code quality, adds new test suites to ensure the correct behavior of the Changes
Uplevel your code reviews with CodeRabbit ProCodeRabbit ProIf you like this project, please support us by purchasing the Pro version. The Pro version has advanced context, superior noise reduction and several proprietary improvements compared to the open source version. Moreover, CodeRabbit Pro is free for open source projects. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Files selected (5)
- .eslintrc.json (1)
- 6 (1)
- index.js (1)
- src/js/api/auth/login.test.js (1)
- src/test/baseline.test.js (1)
Files ignored due to filter (4)
- babel.config.json
- cypress.json
- package-lock.json
- package.json
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .eslintrc.json
- src/test/baseline.test.js
Review comments generated (7)
- Review: 7
- LGTM: 0
Tips
Chat with 
CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)
- Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
- Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging
@coderabbitaiin a reply.
Code suggestions
- The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
- You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.
Pausing incremental reviews
- Add
@coderabbitai: ignoreanywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.
|
|
||
| added 52 packages, and audited 371 packages in 3s | ||
|
|
||
| 54 packages are looking for funding | ||
| run `npm fund` for details | ||
|
|
||
| 3 high severity vulnerabilities | ||
|
|
||
| To address all issues, run: | ||
| npm audit fix | ||
|
|
||
| Run `npm audit` for details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes indicate that there are 3 high severity vulnerabilities in your dependencies. It's recommended to address these issues as soon as possible to maintain the security of your application. You can do this by running npm audit fix. If automatic fixing is not possible, you may need to manually update or replace the affected packages.
+ npm audit fixAlso, consider setting up a process to regularly check for and resolve vulnerabilities in your dependencies. This could be a scheduled job that runs npm audit and alerts you if any vulnerabilities are found.
| global.fetch = mockFetchSuccess; | ||
| const data = await login({}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The login function is being called with an empty object. It would be better to pass in a valid user object for testing.
- const data = await login({});
+ const data = await login(USER_DATA);| global.fetch = mockFetchFailure; | ||
| await expect(login({})).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, the login function should be called with a valid user object even when testing for failure scenarios.
- await expect(login({})).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data");
+ await expect(login(USER_DATA)).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data");| await expect(login({})).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data"); | ||
| }) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There should be a newline at the end of the file for better code formatting and to adhere to common coding standards.
- \ No newline at end of file
+ |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The indentation of the router() function call is inconsistent with the rest of the code. It's best to maintain consistent indentation for readability and maintainability.
- router();
+router();
index.js
Outdated
| import router from "./router/index.js"; | ||
| import ui from "./ui/index.js"; | ||
|
|
||
| ui() | ||
| router() No newline at end of file | ||
| ui(); | ||
| router(); | ||
|
|
||
| // h | ||
| console.log(dogcat) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: This review was outside of the patch, but no patch was found that overlapped with it. Original lines [9-9]
The variable dogcat is not defined anywhere in the provided code, which will cause a ReferenceError at runtime. Please ensure that dogcat is properly defined before it's used.
- console.log(dogcat)
+ // console.log(dogcat) // Uncomment this line once 'dogcat' is defined| router(); | ||
|
|
||
| // h |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There should be a newline at the end of the file. This is a common convention that makes it easier to concatenate files and work with them on the command line. Some tools might not work correctly with files that don't end with a newline.
- \ No newline at end of file
+ - \ No newline at end of file
+
|
|
||
| added 52 packages, and audited 371 packages in 3s | ||
|
|
||
| 54 packages are looking for funding | ||
| run `npm fund` for details | ||
|
|
||
| 3 high severity vulnerabilities | ||
|
|
||
| To address all issues, run: | ||
| npm audit fix | ||
|
|
||
| Run `npm audit` for details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes indicate that there are 3 high severity vulnerabilities in your dependencies. It's recommended to address these issues as soon as possible to maintain the security of your application. You can do this by running npm audit fix. If automatic fixing is not possible, you may need to manually update or replace the affected packages.
+ npm audit fixAlso, consider setting up a process to regularly check for and resolve vulnerabilities in your dependencies. This could be a scheduled job that runs npm audit and alerts you if any vulnerabilities are found.
| global.fetch = mockFetchSuccess; | ||
| const data = await login({}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The login function is being called with an empty object. It would be better to pass in a valid user object for testing.
- const data = await login({});
+ const data = await login(USER_DATA);
| global.fetch = mockFetchFailure; | ||
| await expect(login({})).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, the login function should be called with a valid user object even when testing for failure scenarios.
- await expect(login({})).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data");
+ await expect(login(USER_DATA)).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data");
| await expect(login({})).rejects.toThrow("Unable to fetch data"); | ||
| }) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There should be a newline at the end of the file for better code formatting and to adhere to common coding standards.
- \ No newline at end of file
+
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The indentation of the router() function call is inconsistent with the rest of the code. It's best to maintain consistent indentation for readability and maintainability.
- router();
+router();
index.js
Outdated
| import router from "./router/index.js"; | ||
| import ui from "./ui/index.js"; | ||
|
|
||
| ui() | ||
| router() No newline at end of file | ||
| ui(); | ||
| router(); | ||
|
|
||
| // h | ||
| console.log(dogcat) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: This review was outside of the patch, but no patch was found that overlapped with it. Original lines [9-9]
The variable dogcat is not defined anywhere in the provided code, which will cause a ReferenceError at runtime. Please ensure that dogcat is properly defined before it's used.
- console.log(dogcat)
+ // console.log(dogcat) // Uncomment this line once 'dogcat' is defined
| router(); | ||
|
|
||
| // h |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There should be a newline at the end of the file. This is a common convention that makes it easier to concatenate files and work with them on the command line. Some tools might not work correctly with files that don't end with a newline.
- \ No newline at end of file
+ - \ No newline at end of file
+ 
Better late then never
Summary by CodeRabbit
loginfunction to ensure its correct behavior under different scenarios. Also, included a baseline test case for validation.router()function call for better readability inindex.js.dogcatinindex.jsto prevent potential runtime errors.