darwin.apple_sdk.frameworks.CoreSymbolication: expose under SDK 11.0

[lukegb]

Motivation for this change

This is used by the root package, and otherwise prevents the nixpkgs.tarball build from succeeding (e.g. https://hydra.nixos.org/build/146838433) - because we need CoreSymbolication for aarch64-darwin builds.

I haven't actually tested to see if root will now build on aarch64-darwin, but it does at least instantiate (and nixpkgs.tarball is part of tested, so it does need to evaluate)

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 21.11 Release Notes (or backporting 21.05 Relase notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[lukegb]

Needed for #128467.

[lukegb]

There's also a darwin.CoreSymbolication that might fit the mold here too, but I figured it was safer to use the version from the SDK, even if it is a private framework...

[github-actions]

Backport failed for release-21.05, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally.

git fetch origin release-21.05
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-129292-to-release-21.05 origin/release-21.05
cd .worktree/backport-129292-to-release-21.05
git checkout -b backport-129292-to-release-21.05
ancref=$(git merge-base f8bebb9a94781ac55d73e0992b60b3d2b640503f a7be563707ef20bec6741baa2083b293e360ec31)
git cherry-pick -x $ancref..a7be563707ef20bec6741baa2083b293e360ec31

[vcunat]

Uh, it isn't the only evaluation issue on 21.05. I'm not sure if it makes much sense to really try keeping the property unless some check is running somewhere – at least in the tarball job; hopefully OfBorg as well in future.

[domenkozar]

#129427