Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2ZoneDataCenterHVAC_wEconomizer with ITE objects fails on annual run #4773

Closed
mjwitte opened this issue Mar 5, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4817
Closed

2ZoneDataCenterHVAC_wEconomizer with ITE objects fails on annual run #4773

mjwitte opened this issue Mar 5, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4817
Labels
PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available

Comments

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Mar 5, 2015

In early June, east zone gets hot - chilled water coil is not keeping up, but not clear why. When this issue is addressed 2ZoneDataCenterHVAC_wEconomizer with have ElectricEquipment:ITE:AirCooled objects in place of plain ElectricEquipment objects, and it will run well for an annual simulation. Current state of 2ZoneDataCenterHVAC_wEconomizer put into defects folder for now, but should ultimately become the modified example file (test file). Annual version of the idf is the later one, changes here need to be merged back to the non-annual version.

@mjwitte mjwitte added SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority EnergyPlus labels Mar 5, 2015
@mjwitte mjwitte mentioned this issue Mar 11, 2015
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant