Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dtc/develop branch to work with ccpp-physics/framework as of 20200608 #183

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Jun 9, 2020

Conversation

grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

The majority of the code changes have been reviewed as part of the update to master on May 4. I merged in the branch of SCM that worked with HWRF physics and manually took much of that out such that it can be reinstated when HWRF physics officially comes to dtc/develop.

Most of the updates corresponding to the ccpp-physics/framework dtc/develop updates from master are in GFS_typedefs.[F90/meta].

This code has been tested (cmake, make, multi_run) without compilation or runtime errors on Mac only.

Associated PRs:

NCAR/ccpp-framework#301
NCAR/ccpp-physics#458
NCAR/fv3atm#52
NCAR/ufs-weather-model#50

…d a namelist that exercises the hurricane version of moninedmf
…e; add a multi_run configuration file for the using the hurricane PBL namelist for all supported cases
…e initialized to something other than 0 in gfdl_sfc_layer)
…e static/no-static differentiation, remove unused namelist option
Update master branch to work with master ccpp-physics/framework
…th latest dtc/develop branch; update submodule pointers
scm/src/GFS_typedefs.F90 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scm/src/GFS_typedefs.F90 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@grantfirl grantfirl merged commit cb1dd17 into NCAR:dtc/develop Jun 9, 2020
dustinswales pushed a commit to dustinswales/ccpp-scm that referenced this pull request May 16, 2022
Update dtc/develop branch to work with ccpp-physics/framework as of 20200608
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants