-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: bump axios #7758
fix: bump axios #7758
Conversation
Vulnerability Found: Severity: MODERATE Modules: @consensys/on-ramp-sdk>axios, appium-adb>@appium/support>axios, axios URL: GHSA-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx Vulnerability Found: Severity: MODERATE Modules: @consensys/on-ramp-sdk>axios, appium-adb>@appium/support>axios, axios URL: GHSA-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx Vulnerability Found: Severity: MODERATE Modules: @consensys/on-ramp-sdk>axios, appium-adb>@appium/support>axios, axios URL: GHSA-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx
Vulnerability Found: Severity: MODERATE Modules: axios URL: GHSA-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consider v1.6.1, spotted in
Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
|
👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored. Ignoring: Next stepsTake a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with |
@SocketSecurity ignore axios@1.6.0 network access expected
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7758 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.10% 35.10%
=======================================
Files 1039 1039
Lines 27619 27619
Branches 2336 2336
=======================================
Hits 9695 9695
Misses 17401 17401
Partials 523 523 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/9347946f-db7b-4146-8078-f5b342539d43 |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LG
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, do we test the on ramp on the release testing @Andepande ? it would be good to check it since we are doing a major upgrade version on axios, since it is used by them
merged after discussions ^ we can follow-up on comments if agreed later to
|
## **Description** - Updates the documentation and `js.env.example` file with the new variable `METAMASK_ENVIRONMENT`. - Adds a small note on the `README.md` with instructions for updating envars ## **Related issues** Fixes: # ## **Manual testing steps** Not applicable ## **Screenshots/Recordings** ### **Before** Not applicable ### **After** Not applicable ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [x] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [x] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [x] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
Description
Fix CI failing on Improved Yarn Audit step
Related issues
Manual testing steps
Screenshots/Recordings
Before
After
Pre-merge author checklist
Pre-merge reviewer checklist