feat: upgrade assets controllers to v44

[bergeron]

Description

Upgrades the assets controllers to v44. In this version, the token balances controller now stores erc20 balances across all chains and accounts, instead of just the current chain and account like before. This allows polling erc20 balances across chains.

Related issues

Depends on: #12340

Manual testing steps

With PORTFOLIO_VIEW=false and PORTFOLIO_VIEW=true:

1. Onboard
2. Verify erc20 tokens have correct balances
3. Switch chains
4. Verify the erc20 tokens on the new chain have correct balances
5. Send a TX that changes an erc20 balance
6. Verify it gets updated after tx completes

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 794ad13
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/2b53becd-ca15-4157-8fd4-9b0f1065eea4

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[OGPoyraz]

Confirmation changes (only tests as far as I see) looks fine

[tommasini]

This update needs a migration to clean the contractBalances from the user data
https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/4782/files#diff-09448a98d6ea70ebb5f28c2d45687d07bfb5beef1db71d326bf151e6246e410dR42

But it can be a follow up PR

It would be nice to have some recordings as well

[christopherferreira9]

LGTM

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
62.5% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud