fix: Reuse main logic for migration52

[Cal-L]

Description

These changes refactors migration 52 and 57 to use consolidated logic. Comments was also added explaining that the migrations are the same

Related issues

Fixes: #12115

Manual testing steps

Follow same steps in PR #12115

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 3ada1a5
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/64b25c96-f99d-4f87-a523-0a94a680ef48

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[NicolasMassart]

I made a small change on the comment to make it even more explicit.

[Gudahtt]

LGTM!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[Cal-L]

Bitrise failure not related to this PR