-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SSL error: The certificate authority is not trusted #2012
Comments
Hi @coomac thanks for reporting. Could you try closing all tabs you might have open in your MetaMask browser, quit the app, and try again? |
Thanks for getting back to me. I switched to a different rom (also based on
AOSP from Nov 5) and the error vanished. The bug report can be closed. If
the error appears again in the future with a different rom, I will try to
do more digging.
To answer your question though, I had tried the sites for uniswap,
balancer, zapper, yearn finance, bbc and google.
Also, troubleshooting-wise, I had closed all metamask tabs, cleared the
browser history and cookies within metamask, cleared the app cache/storage
in android settings, wiped dalvik in twrp, reinstalled the app, and
changed my web view app with no luck.
|
Is there any solutiom to this? I have this same issue on metamask app on different devices these 2 days and I didn't root any of my devices. Thamks |
Are you using a pihole or some other system-wide adblocker? In my case, my adblocker was blocking a url related to the certificate (only made the connection because a somewhat similar issue popped up when logging in on another app). I just switched block lists. |
Make sense. However, I never installed such app in my devices. What do you mean by switching block lists, and where did you do that? |
I was using Adaway at the time and had to disable one of the adblock lists in the app. Don't recall which list since I now use Next DNS. Does the error show up randomly but the websites work at other times? Also, do you get the same error on both devices at the same time regardless of if they're connected to data, your home wifi, work or some random cafe wifi? |
I'm debugging my local DAPP. I use the HTTPS certificate generated locally by mkcert, which also reports this error. Is there a way to solve it, thank you |
I have tried to modify some code underneath and recompiled, it works fine finally: <base-config cleartextTrafficPermitted="false">
<trust-anchors>
<certificates src="system" />
<certificates src="user" />
</trust-anchors>
</base-config> you guys could download this recompiled apk from here, only for development. |
Hey everyone. |
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 7 days with no activity. If you feel this was closed in error please reopen and provide evidence on the current production app. Thank you for your contributions. |
## **Description** Display staking transaction methods in the transaction confirmation rather than `Unknown Method`. Specifically: - Provide new `TransactionType` values in the `addTransaction` options. - Add action keys for staking transaction types. - Upgrade `@metamask/transaction-controller` to `38.2.0`. ## **Related issues** Fixes: [#2012](MetaMask/mobile-planning#2012) ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Add `export MM_POOLED_STAKING_UI_ENABLED="true"` to `.js.env`. 2. Create each staking transaction type. 3. Verify method is correct and not `Unknown Method`. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** ### **Before** <img width="200" alt="Before" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c68c7f06-eb73-4d09-b02e-939ac4232a1c"> ### **After** <img width="200" alt="Deposit" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cf566eb-8269-4ea9-a2bf-246cbf80f787"> <img width="200" alt="Claim" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5704717d-e037-4e25-9ad2-b345fd53d8cf"> <img width="200" alt="Unstake" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5d0f0e5e-138f-4913-93b6-9fc28233b244"> <img width="200" alt="Activity List" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d8c7224-4fdb-45c2-8b30-2cdeae0eb97c"> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
## **Description** Display staking transaction methods in the transaction confirmation rather than `Unknown Method`. Specifically: - Provide new `TransactionType` values in the `addTransaction` options. - Add action keys for staking transaction types. - Upgrade `@metamask/transaction-controller` to `38.2.0`. ## **Related issues** Fixes: [#2012](MetaMask/mobile-planning#2012) ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Add `export MM_POOLED_STAKING_UI_ENABLED="true"` to `.js.env`. 2. Create each staking transaction type. 3. Verify method is correct and not `Unknown Method`. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** ### **Before** <img width="200" alt="Before" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c68c7f06-eb73-4d09-b02e-939ac4232a1c"> ### **After** <img width="200" alt="Deposit" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cf566eb-8269-4ea9-a2bf-246cbf80f787"> <img width="200" alt="Claim" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5704717d-e037-4e25-9ad2-b345fd53d8cf"> <img width="200" alt="Unstake" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5d0f0e5e-138f-4913-93b6-9fc28233b244"> <img width="200" alt="Activity List" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d8c7224-4fdb-45c2-8b30-2cdeae0eb97c"> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
Describe the bug
This error message appears when I try to use the built in browser on metamask android to visit any website:
Oops! something went wrong...
We weren't able to load that page.
Reason: SSL error: The certificate authority is not trusted.
Screenshot
To Reproduce
The error appears on the homepage (https://home.metamask.io) as well as on any other website manually typed into the address bar. No websites can be accessed because the error cannot be bypassed.
Expected behavior
Website should load without an error.
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Not sure if this is a problem introduced with the Nov 19 metamask update or from the rom (both were installed around the same time). I have noticed other wallets that are somewhat incompatible with various roms running the Nov security update.
to be added after bug submission by internal support / PM
Severity
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: