Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Payment card / Subscription] Rollout feature: replace Subscriptions menu item #45089

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor

@JKobrynski JKobrynski commented Jul 9, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #42473
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. To access the newly created component you need an active subscription (if you don't have one already you can create it in the old dot)
  2. Log into the app (use the account with an active subscription)
  3. Navigate to the settings page
  4. Verify if you can see a Subscription menu item in the LHN (See screenshots for reference)
  5. Make sure it looks and works correctly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as Tests section above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Active

active

Inactive

inactive

Free trial

Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 13 53 39

Brick road indicator

rbr

@JKobrynski JKobrynski marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2024 12:11
@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested review from a team as code owners July 10, 2024 12:11
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team July 10, 2024 12:11
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 10, 2024

@rayane-djouah Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from rayane-djouah July 10, 2024 12:11
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ function AllSettingsScreen({policies}: AllSettingsScreenProps) {
...(shouldShowSubscriptionsMenu
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what about this place? Shouldnt flag be removed from here as well and then altogether from codebase?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would make sense, but from what I can see, this screen is not used anywhere 🤔 What do you think?

CC: @fabioh8010

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm I thought you've added it here :D Now that I think of it shouldn't the action lead to NewDot Subscription page now that we've build it here or is this something completely different?

Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that AllSettingsScreen is not used anywhere in the app, but I think it's safer to replace shouldShowSubscriptionsMenu with the new NVP there. and delete shouldShowSubscriptionsMenu files as they are not needed anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

How can I create an active subscription in old dot?

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

How can I create an active subscription in old dot?

Just create a Collect or Control workspace.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah confirming you're good here?

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify - yeah, will update shortly, could you please give me access to the design doc to ensure that I have full requirements understanding?

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Done!

@@ -222,7 +221,7 @@ function InitialSettingsPage({session, userWallet, bankAccountList, fundList, wa
sectionTranslationKey: 'common.workspaces',
items,
};
}, [policies, styles.badgeSuccess, styles.workspaceSettingsSectionContainer, translate]);
}, [policies, privateSubscription, styles, translate]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
}, [policies, privateSubscription, styles, translate]);
}, [policies, privateSubscription, styles.lhnSuccessText, styles.workspaceSettingsSectionContainer, translate]);

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

Bug: "Free trial" label is not aligned to the right with other icons

Screenshot 2024-07-10 at 6 18 57 PM

cc @Expensify/design

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm yeah, and shouldn't that use our badge pattern to? From staging, I see this when I make a trial:
CleanShot 2024-07-10 at 19 34 21@2x

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

I see this in the design mocks:

Screenshot 2024-07-10 at 6 42 48 PM Screenshot 2024-07-10 at 6 43 19 PM

So, I guess we don't use the badge pattern for this by design?

and I guess the "Free trial" label and the RBR also should be aligned to the right with other icons, right?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

cc @Expensify/design - do you remember where we landed with this one?

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-07-10.at.6.47.52.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-07-10.at.6.37.49.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-07-10.at.18.38.18.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-07-10.at.18.34.51.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-07-10.at.6.31.19.PM.mov
Screenshot 2024-07-10 at 6 28 04 PM Screenshot 2024-07-10 at 6 30 20 PM
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-07-10.at.6.35.10.PM.mov

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@JKobrynski - has the Spanish copy been approved internally?

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

do you remember where we landed with this one?

We landed on using the badge as seen in this Figma file/mock. I think the mock that's being referenced here is an old one.

TLDR: Staging is correct.

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@dannymcclain - could you please share the mock here, the shared link is internal

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Oops, sorry! It basically looks identical to what Shawn's screenshot shows.

CleanShot 2024-07-10 at 13 25 31@2x

image

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated, this is what it looks like now:

Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 13 53 39

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Can you show us what the hover/active state of that row looks like too?

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Jul 11, 2024

@shawnborton - Here is a video that shows the hover/active state:

Screen.Recording.2024-07-11.at.3.41.00.PM.mov

And this screenshot shows the RBR:

Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 3 44 19 PM

Comment on lines +1437 to +1441
lhnSuccessText: {
color: theme.success,
fontWeight: FontUtils.fontWeight.bold,
},

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
lhnSuccessText: {
color: theme.success,
fontWeight: FontUtils.fontWeight.bold,
},

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: unused style

@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ function AllSettingsScreen({policies}: AllSettingsScreenProps) {
hoverAndPressStyle: styles.hoveredComponentBG,
brickRoadIndicator: item.brickRoadIndicator,
}));
}, [isSmallScreenWidth, styles.hoveredComponentBG, styles.sectionMenuItem, translate, waitForNavigate, policies]);
}, [isSmallScreenWidth, policies, privateSubscription, waitForNavigate, translate, styles]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
}, [isSmallScreenWidth, policies, privateSubscription, waitForNavigate, translate, styles]);
}, [isSmallScreenWidth, policies, privateSubscription, waitForNavigate, translate, styles.hoveredComponentBG, styles.sectionMenuItem]);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB as this component is not used anywhere in the app

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 4 00 39 PM
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 4 00 06 PM
iOS: Native

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro Max - 2024-07-11 at 15 58 55

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro Max - 2024-07-11 at 15 58 25

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-07-11.at.3.41.00.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-07-11.at.3.51.56.PM.mov

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, this looks pretty great to me. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from blimpich July 11, 2024 15:14
Copy link
Contributor

@blimpich blimpich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, waiting for confirmation that we're ready to make the subscription page available to customers before merging.

@blimpich blimpich changed the title [Payment card / Subscription] [HOLD all] Rollout feature: replace Subscriptions menu item [Payment card / Subscription] Rollout feature: replace Subscriptions menu item Jul 11, 2024
@blimpich blimpich merged commit c53bd5c into Expensify:main Jul 11, 2024
17 of 21 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.0.7-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.7-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.7-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.8-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@@ -49,10 +50,10 @@ function AllSettingsScreen({policies}: AllSettingsScreenProps) {
focused: !isSmallScreenWidth,
brickRoadIndicator: hasGlobalWorkspaceSettingsRBR(policies) ? CONST.BRICK_ROAD_INDICATOR_STATUS.ERROR : undefined,
},
...(shouldShowSubscriptionsMenu
...(privateSubscription
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not considering an active subscription plan based on control/collect workspace for display of subscription menu resulted in #45720

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants