fix: Track tax switch does not appear grayed out when enabled/disabled offline

[nkdengineer]

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #43318
PROPOSAL:

Tests

1. Go to workspace settings > Distance rates
2. Go offline
3. Click Settings
4. Enable or disable Track tax switch
5. Verify that: Track tax switch will appear grayed out when enabled/disabled offline

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

1. Go to workspace settings > Distance rates
2. Go offline
3. Click Settings
4. Enable or disable Track tax switch
5. Verify that: Track tax switch will appear grayed out when enabled/disabled offline

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

ios.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web.mov

MacOS: Desktop

desktop.mov

[melvin-bot]

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[nkdengineer]

@eVoloshchak Please help to review the PR when you have a chance. Thanks.

[srikarparsi]

@eVoloshchak please tag me after you review

[eVoloshchak]

@nkdengineer, could you please add the screen recording for all of the platforms?
(you can four-finger tap to open a menu with Force Offline option)

[nkdengineer]

@eVoloshchak please check again

[srikarparsi]

Hey @eVoloshchak can you take a look at this please?

[nkdengineer]

friendly dump @eVoloshchak

[eVoloshchak]

Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-08-12.at.18.36.29.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-08-12.at.18.40.34.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-08-12.at.18.43.58.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-08-12.at.18.41.27.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-08-12.at.18.28.40.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-08-12.at.18.44.38.mov

[eVoloshchak]

App crash:

1. Clear cache
2. Force offline
3. Go to workspace settings (has to be a workspace you haven't opened yet, no workspace data is loaded at this point)
4. Go to 'Distance rates' tab
5. Click Settings
6. The app crashes

Screen.Recording.2024-06-24.at.17.20.42.mov

[nkdengineer]

I can't reproduce this bug
After Clear cache it still has workspace data

web-resize.mp4

[eVoloshchak]

@nkdengineer, you can more reliably reproduce this using the following steps:

1. Fully clear cookies and site data in browser (View site information -> Cookies and site data -> Manage on-device site data -> Delete each item -> Done)
2. Refresh the page
3. Log in
4. Go to Settings -> Troubleshoot, turn on Force Offline option
5. Head to Workspaces, select any workspace
6. Select Distance Rates -> Settings
7. Observe the crash

Screen.Recording.2024-06-26.at.18.37.17.mov

[eVoloshchak]

Bug:

1. Go to Settings -> Workspaces
2. Create a new workspace
3. Go to More Features
4. Turn on Distance Rates and Taxes
5. Head to Distance Rates -> Settings
6. Track Tax switch is not responsive
7. The error is displayed when changing Unit and Default Category

Screen.Recording.2024-06-26.at.18.46.32.mov

[nkdengineer]

Working on this issue

[nkdengineer]

@eVoloshchak thanks for your detailed steps, I can reproduce this bug

Screen.Recording.2024-06-28.at.14.19.47.mov

in this case, we don't have customUnits data, I think we should block the page in offline if data is already available
like we do with tag settings page in this PR

[nkdengineer]

I'll update today

[nkdengineer]

@MonilBhavsar @eVoloshchak When user clears cache and restart, we call API openApp. You can see in this video below, that we have some workspaces that will not have a default rate

web-resize.mp4

It will cause some errors when we create a new distance rate because we don’t have customUnitsID

[MonilBhavsar]

You think that not having custom unit ID is wrong and we should fix this case in backend?

[nkdengineer]

@MonilBhavsar If the backend can return customUnitID of all workspaces when calling OpenApp API, we will not encounter bugs like the ones mentioned above.

[MonilBhavsar]

I see. AFAIK, We decided not to load all policies on opening app for performance reasons. Basically to reduce initial app loading time. So we need to be optimistic here. Can we load it when we open a specific workspace page?

[nkdengineer]

Let me check again if we can have a solution in front-end.

[nkdengineer]

@MonilBhavsar @eVoloshchak
When offline and the workspace does not have a customUnit, we will not know the customUnitID and will send customUnitID = ''. This will result in an error as follows:

I think in the case when offline and there is no customUnit, we should not allow adding a new rate to display the FullPageOfflineBlockingView page.

[eVoloshchak]

I think in the case when offline and there is no customUnit, we should not allow adding a new rate to display the FullPageOfflineBlockingView page

@nkdengineer, yeah, let's do this

[nkdengineer]

I'll update today

[nkdengineer]

@eVoloshchak i updated, please check agin

bug.mov

[eVoloshchak]

LGTM!

[srikarparsi]

This looks good to me other than making defaultValue optional. Testing between offline and online mode also works well. Thank you @nkdengineer and @eVoloshchak for covering the edge cases.

[srikarparsi]

Also thank you @MonilBhavsar for helping move this along. I added you to the initial issue.

[MonilBhavsar]

Looks good

[MonilBhavsar]

Thanks for continuing working on this!

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MonilBhavsar in version: 9.0.20-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

[Beamanator]

FYI I believe this was deployed to prod yesterday, from this checklist - #47356