Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the emoji picker does not close when editing message is deleted #22984

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@hoangzinh hoangzinh commented Jul 17, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #22214
PROPOSAL: #22214 (comment)

Tests

  1. Login with userA’s account
  2. Click FAB => Go to the “New room” section
  3. Create a public room with userA workspace
  4. Go to the room details
  5. Share code > Copy URL to clipboard

  6. Open other browser and login with userB’s account
  7. Join the room by pasting room URL

  8. Send a message in room from userB
  9. Click on “Edit comment” message after sent
  10. Open emoji picker
  11. Switch back to UserA's account and delete the message sent by UserB
  12. Verify that The emoji picker should close when UserA deletes the message that UserB is editing
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Could not test when network is offline

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.20.39.07.-.web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.20.54.58.-.android.chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.20.53.05.-.ios.safari.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.20.45.05.-.desktop.mp4
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.20.49.58.-.ios.mp4
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.20.53.58.-.android.mov

@hoangzinh hoangzinh marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2023 13:56
@hoangzinh hoangzinh requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2023 13:56
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from allroundexperts and removed request for a team July 17, 2023 13:56
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 17, 2023

@allroundexperts Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

allroundexperts commented Jul 17, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.2.16.27.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.2.28.34.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.2.23.04.PM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.2.19.48.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.2.25.15.PM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.2.33.44.PM.mov

if (!isFocusedRef.current) {
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused.
// In small screen devices, when EmojiPicker is show, the current edit message will be lost focus, we need to check this case as well.
if (!isFocusedRef.current && !EmojiPickerAction.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be || instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we go with || it should be !(isFocusedRef.current || EmojiPickerAction.isActiveReportAction(..)) then. So my intention here is would like to cover a case in small screen device, when we edit a message, then open Emoji, the edit composer will be lost focus => With current implement, when we hide the EmojiPicker, the main composer won't be show in small screen devices.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm not getting the logic. Can you please explain further more clearly?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright. With our change according to my proposal, we reveal another bug that I think we should fix it in this PR.

Step to reproduce: on small screen devices:

  1. Login with userA’s account
  2. Create a public room with userA workspace
  3. Copy public room URL
  4. Open other browser and login with userB’s account
  5. Join the room by pasting room URL

  6. Send a message in room from userB
  7. Click on “Edit comment” message after sent
  8. Open emoji picker
  9. Switch back to UserA's account and delete the message sent by UserB
    We can observe that EmojiPicker is hided but the main composer is hide as well.
Screen.Recording.2023-07-18.at.20.42.56.mov

So previously in the componentWillUnmount logic of ReportActionItemMessageEdit:

return () => {
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused
if (!isFocusedRef.current) {
return;
}
// Show the main composer when the focused message is deleted from another client
// to prevent the main composer stays hidden until we swtich to another chat.
ComposerActions.setShouldShowComposeInput(true);
};

We will check

  • If we're focusing on a Edit message => When it's unmounted due to deleted
  • If we're out focus on a Edit message => We're already show the main composer => Not need to show main composer anymore.

But with our change, when an Edit message is out focus, it might be there is a EmojiPicker is opening. So when we unmount an Edit message, we should check if there is an EmojiPicker related to the current Edit message is opening, we should show the main composer as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. This makes sense!

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from marcaaron July 18, 2023 18:44
src/pages/home/report/ReportActionItemMessageEdit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -118,16 +119,17 @@ function ReportActionItemMessageEdit(props) {
});

return () => {
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused
if (!isFocusedRef.current) {
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sort of confused by this comment. Do we mean something like this?

Suggested change
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused.
// Skip showing the main composer if the context menu is active for this reportAction. We want the "Edit composer" text input stay focused in this case.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah nope @marcaaron . I'm not really full understand the first comment as well. But I guess what they mean is if we have multiple Editing messages, and if the current edit message is not focus when unmount => we can skip show main composer to let another editing message still be focused.

Back to our case, I would like to say if the current edit message is not focus by opening its EmojiPicker, we should treat as it's still focus and show main composer (because we are still editing this message)

Co-authored-by: Marc Glasser <marc.aaron.glasser@gmail.com>
@marcaaron marcaaron self-requested a review July 19, 2023 23:59
@marcaaron marcaaron merged commit 4a8b431 into Expensify:main Jul 20, 2023
11 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.44-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.44-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.45-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.45-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

if (!isFocusedRef.current) {
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused.
// In small screen devices, when EmojiPicker is shown, the current edit message will lose focus, we need to check this case as well.
if (!isFocusedRef.current && !EmojiPickerAction.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This caused a regression (case 3). If we focus on message A, open it's emoji picker and close it, then focus on message B and delete message A then the main composer will show up. This is due to the faulty EmojiPickerAction.isActiveReportAction check as it returns true for message A even though the emoji picker is no longer open.

What we had to do is to clear the active report action accordingly i.e. if we are deleting message A and it's emoji picker is not open then EmojiPickerAction.isActiveReportAction should return false.

if (!isFocusedRef.current) {
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused.
// In small screen devices, when EmojiPicker is shown, the current edit message will lose focus, we need to check this case as well.
if (!isFocusedRef.current && !EmojiPickerAction.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This caused a bug where this condition returns false when composer is not focused but save button is pressed, since onFocus function is synchronous and takes some times to get focus. Thus causing edit input to be still open and main composer not to show: #32218

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants