-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[IOUDetailsModal] deprecate component and cleanup code #19199
Merged
luacmartins
merged 8 commits into
Expensify:main
from
Prince-Mendiratta:feat/19167-deprecate-IOUDetailsModal
May 23, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8c56957
feat: deprecate IOUDetailsModal
Prince-Mendiratta 943bf05
feat: remove isIOUAction prop
Prince-Mendiratta d5f654a
chore: merge conflicts
Prince-Mendiratta b903bc9
feat: use getBankAccountRoute
Prince-Mendiratta ad1542b
feat: expense report then workspace bank else personal
Prince-Mendiratta 20627ea
chore: merge conflicts
Prince-Mendiratta fe5d34a
feat: move duplicate code to function
Prince-Mendiratta 9426102
chore: prettier
Prince-Mendiratta File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@0xmiroslav I'm not familiar with the KYC Wall flow but theoretically, this should be good as it is used in the below mentioned place as well but I'd still appreciate if you could confirm it.
App/src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.js
Line 291 in 5fab2de
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use
getBankAccountRoute
instead? We should pass the policyID if this is an Expense reportThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@luacmartins why should we use
getBankAccountRoute
instead? Isn'taddBankAccountRoute
supposed to redirect tosettings/payments/add-bank-account
page? Doesbank-account/${stepToOpen}?policyID=${policyID}
automatically redirect to the add-bank-account page if none is linked?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we have two conditions here:
IOU report: redirect to
settings/payments/add-bank-account
. UseSETTINGS_ADD_BANK_ACCOUNT
routeExpense report: redirect to
bank-account/new?policyID=${policyID}
. Use this method