-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[$1000] No error message when entering an invalid email for a new chat #16884
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @NicMendonca ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
@kavimuru why did you unassign @NicMendonca? |
Triggered auto assignment to @alexpensify ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
I assigned a new bug zero member since Nicole is OOO for a bit. |
@neil-marcellini I thought you want to take care of this issue. |
Yes. Each issue is assigned a bug zero member to handle the people side of things, and a internal engineer to help the contributors. |
Bump @alexpensify |
Due to the Holiday weekend, we have a low number of Concierge teammembers online, I've had to prioritize Concierge Ops over Bug Zero. I'll try to get to this one later today. |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0132343b72b9eb2960 |
Current assignee @alexpensify is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @fedirjh ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @davidcardoza ( |
I would also like a Spanish translation please. |
Should we describe why the email is invalid - "This email is invalid due to incorrect formatting" ? |
That feels a bit redundant to me. Why else would it be invalid? Maybe we could say "Invalid email. Please check for typos and try again." I kind of prefer simply "Invalid email". |
Cool, let’s go with "invalid email" |
Regression Test ProposalBug: No error message when entering an invalid email for a new chat Proposed Test Steps:
Do we 👍 or 👎 |
IMO this is not worth the effort to test, it's not that critical. |
@neil-marcellini and @fedirjh - since there is no testing, is this one ready for payment? I think the automation is off on this one because we are skipping the regression period testing. |
I believe it is still in the regression period and payment should be made on the 26th. It was deployed to prod on the 19th |
Thanks, I'll add a reminder for that day. |
I've removed David C. and the copy requirement since this one is in the works now. |
Alright, we hit the 26th. @neil-marcellini and @fedirjh - any pushback on moving to payment since the automation didn't run here to update the GitHub state? |
@alexpensify No regressions were found during the regression period, so it's ready for payment. |
Thank you for the update @fedirjh! I'll work on the payment process tomorrow. |
I saw this in another GH and want to give it a try here to ensure that the payment is correct. We have the following payouts. I see there is no 50% bonus or penalty because it was assigned #16884 (comment) on April 11 and was merged on April 17: Issue reporter: $250 - N/A (Internal) @neil-marcellini or @fedirjh - Can you please 👍🏼 if you agree and I'll complete the next steps in Upwork. Thank you! |
@alexpensify That's correct, No bonus applicable for this issue. |
Alright, all payments have been prepared in Upwork and are pending approval from the contributors. I'll finish the process as soon as everyone signs off in Upwork. Thanks! |
Everyone has been paid via Upwork and I've closed the job, so I'm closing the GH too. |
@fedirjh @alexpensify Hi just checking since we have a hold period where we wait for the correct copy for the error message starting on Apr 13 and ending on Apr 16, would that be considered in the PR timeline calculation? If excluding that hold period then I think the PR is merged within 3 business days. |
There's nothing you could do to speed up waiting for copy, so I don't think we should count it towards the PR timeline. |
Thanks! @neil-marcellini
@alexpensify With that in mind can you reconsider if PR urgency bonus is applicable here? If excluding the "waiting for copy" period, the PR is merged within 3 business days. |
@dukenv0307 - please give me a day to review again, because I shared the payouts here: #16884 (comment). I need to find my notes for this GH. |
Alright, I'm going to issue a $500 urgency bonus to: Contributor: @dukenv0307 Please reply if you disagree or have other feedback, I'll work on the payment process tomorrow. Thanks! |
I've sent the offers in Upwork, please accept and I can complete the process. Thank you! |
@alexpensify accepted, thank you! |
Alright, everyone has been paid out via Upwork. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
An “Invalid email” error message is displayed
Actual Result:
“No results found” is displayed but there’s no other indication that this is an invalid email
Workaround:
unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.2.93-4
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @neil-marcellini
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1680540207948259
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: