Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the BUG of V0 receiver setting IBUS SBUS; add the setting item of… #3443

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 13, 2023

Conversation

Xy2019
Copy link
Contributor

@Xy2019 Xy2019 commented Apr 6, 2023

… INRM301.

Fixes #3388
Fixes #3389
Fixes #3390

Summary of changes:
1.Added V1 receiver's setting of PWM and synchronization for each channel; added restrictions on setting NewPort (four NewPorts only support one interface output PPM at the same time. SBUS IBUS-IN IBUS-OUT is the same).
2.Modify the BUG of FTr4/FGr4s/FGr4P three receiving settings IBUS-IN IBUS-OUT SBUS. After the binding is successful, get the product number of the receiver, and then resend the command to set IBUS SBUS according to the product number. For example, if the user selects SBUS and the binding is successful, the program must send IBUS IBUS-OUT SBUS commands in sequence.

@pfeerick pfeerick modified the milestones: 2.8.3, 2.8.2 Apr 6, 2023
@richardclli richardclli force-pushed the flysky-INRM301-setting branch from 87c0f46 to 4c61aa4 Compare April 11, 2023 10:58
@richardclli richardclli force-pushed the flysky-INRM301-setting branch from 4c61aa4 to 3c51a37 Compare April 11, 2023 11:00
@pfeerick
Copy link
Member

Seems to be working fine with EL18 and FTr12B, thanks for this! There are one or two minor cleanups needed but I'll do them in a separate PR as I don't have write access to this branch.

@pfeerick pfeerick merged commit 02e804f into EdgeTX:main Apr 13, 2023
pfeerick added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2023
pfeerick added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2023
ulfhedlund added a commit to ulfhedlund/edgetx that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
@pfeerick pfeerick mentioned this pull request May 23, 2023
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants