Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for acyclicity; remove boundedness requirement #468

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023
Merged

Check for acyclicity; remove boundedness requirement #468

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

cqc-alec
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #455 .
Fixes #447 .
Fixes #435 .

@cqc-alec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I want to remove the single-source-single-sink requirement on the grounds that it adds unnecessary edges, and edges only reduce, never increase, opportunities for optimization.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aborgna-q aborgna-q left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree this is better for optimizations and I cannot find a reason not to allow it, so LGTM

@cqc-alec cqc-alec added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 30, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit c7bfffe Aug 30, 2023
6 checks passed
@cqc-alec cqc-alec deleted the ssss.1 branch August 30, 2023 11:03
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
…put (#762)

I believe the question of causal cones was definitively resolved by
#468, and the codebase seems clear on that point - however, I just
stumbled across this I-believe-erroneous reference in the spec. (FWIW,
searching through the spec for "causal" has only one other occurrence,
which appears to explicitly say we don't need this rule.)
ss2165 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
…put (#762)

I believe the question of causal cones was definitively resolved by
#468, and the codebase seems clear on that point - however, I just
stumbled across this I-believe-erroneous reference in the spec. (FWIW,
searching through the spec for "causal" has only one other occurrence,
which appears to explicitly say we don't need this rule.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants